Amin,
I have never used Xenon 25/0.95 lens before nor could I find any samples online. Based on the price I would assume its good quality lens, but here is why I would have gone with Angenieux.
1. Proven cinematographic and photographic performance.
2. I like my Xenon 50mm f0.95, but I like my Angenieux 50mm 0.95 a bit better, especially the bokeh.
3. Price is about the same, ($1095 at B&H, you can have one of my Angenieux for the same money)
4. Better resale value, if you decide to get rid of it in the future.
5. Even in the best case scenario where Schneider 25mm CCTV lens uses the same glass as Schneider Cine lenses used to have, I would still go with Angenieux. I like Xenon, but I like S and P type Angeneiux better. (unless Xenon 25/0.95 is a super lens that much better than other Xenons)
If money is tight I would go for Angeneiux 25/1.4 which is probably better lens if f1.4 is all you need. (and it doesn't need as much cropping)
The thing is, as I was trying to explain before:
for decades the requirement for CCTV lens manufacturer was to lower the prices at quality expense, while the requirement for Cine lenses was improve the quality at any cost. That is why lots of semi-pro still shoot with Cooke and Kinoptik modified to PL mount, and students use Cooke, Angenieux and Switars on Bolex. (never seen them reaching for cctv lens)
Hope it make sense
(disclaimer - all of my preferences are based on strictly visual parameters, no scientific calculations or pixel pipping is involved)