I understand the technical specs difference between the 2.
I would plan to use the cam 80-90% only with a prime (and I would much prefer 35mm FOV over 40mm FOV, but I would prefer f1.7 over f2.8).
Internel image stabilizer would be great since I thought could be great to use my 90mm Leica Macro M lens on the camera.
So my main question are (and I am very interested in peoples answers who hve tried both cams):
-How big is the (AF)speed difference between the EP2 and the gf1?
-How big is the difference of micro detail (since "they" write the gf1 to have a weaker AA-filter) in RAW?
-How "bad" is the 17/2.8 compared to the 20/1.7? (Since 17mm is more the focal length I would like. I know this because I have used a dp2 for some time and found it sometimes just slightly too narrow and I do love the 35mm Summarit on my M9.
I would be interested in the x1, but I guess to get nearly the same from an EP2/gf1 plus I would get video and posibility to use other lenses if necessary.
Thanks a lot!
I would plan to use the cam 80-90% only with a prime (and I would much prefer 35mm FOV over 40mm FOV, but I would prefer f1.7 over f2.8).
Internel image stabilizer would be great since I thought could be great to use my 90mm Leica Macro M lens on the camera.
So my main question are (and I am very interested in peoples answers who hve tried both cams):
-How big is the (AF)speed difference between the EP2 and the gf1?
-How big is the difference of micro detail (since "they" write the gf1 to have a weaker AA-filter) in RAW?
-How "bad" is the 17/2.8 compared to the 20/1.7? (Since 17mm is more the focal length I would like. I know this because I have used a dp2 for some time and found it sometimes just slightly too narrow and I do love the 35mm Summarit on my M9.
I would be interested in the x1, but I guess to get nearly the same from an EP2/gf1 plus I would get video and posibility to use other lenses if necessary.
Thanks a lot!