Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Her name is MaliAnd we shall name him 'Janus'
Freshly popped ...
Wonderful shot at 400mm.
GX80, so soon or typo?GX80-Oly7-14/2.8: 5 bracketed exposures blended into HDR in LR.
Christ Church, Spitalfields - Nicholas Hawksmoor, Opened 1759.
Well, honestly I'm mighty pleased so far with my copy and its output.Bart, you've made me wanting to buy that damn lens even I don't do birds! Great shots of birds, moth and toad or whatever.
I modified (reframed) that picture and now it has disappeared, so here is the new version.Digging in the archives, I found this picture taken in 2009 with the E-P1
Rue de l'Industrie, Sion
Olympus E-P1 and m.Zuiko 14-42mm @23mm 1/125 F8 ISO800
Most telephoto zooms seem to be superior at shorter focal lengths; I think the focal range was probably chosen (and designed for) because the nomenclature is neat and tidy (4x) and for where it fits into the range of lenses offered, but a 100–250 or 100–300 may have not compromised quality so much at the long end—if indeed that is the case. And it may also have been a bit smaller, lighter, and brighter.Not tack sharp … [note perfectly-formed ellipsis]
grrr, the 300–400mm range is really so-so, could it be the af not being precise? Or ibis?
Thanks Bart, I like the image.Not tack sharp, but I like the green shine here ...
grrr, the 300 - 400mm range is really so-so, could it be the af not being precise ? or ibis?