I don't care what gear I have.
Things I sell: http://www.shutterstock.com/sets/413...html?rid=611056 Member(s) liked this post
Yummy. Bad timing for me, but yummy!
Looking good, looking very good
Looks very good and just comes right time for me!
I am on the fence for getting solely into M43 while getting out of Fuji X. And also skip any APSC cameras from CaNikon and others, as the reals size and quality advantage is there with M43 - however you choose, either EM1, EP5 or even GX7.
I missed soooo many shots with my Fuji X Pro 1 because of slow and unresponsive AF, also with all FW upgrades available. I never missed any shot because of that with my OMD. Plus when comparing XPro1, OMD and Pentax K5IIs IQ, I cannot help but overall like IQ from OMD best.
So I expect at least same IQ from EM1 and together with the new lens (and hopefully other similar lenses to come from Olympus) they will be back in the highest ranks of digital photography.
For me M43 finally now seems to have matured
Well, my K5IIs tops my E-M5 by a whisker, they are really close but I think the Pentax has the edge.
So I'm looking forward to see what this E-M1 can do.
Bart ...1 Member(s) liked this post
Maybe it is only the way I operate the camera or shoot, but finally this is what I can get out easily and this is what matters most for me.
Having said that the K5IIs is a great camera and Pentax lenses are superb.
One thing I saw that is rather interesting is the HDR label on the knob on the left side of the pentaprism. I wonder if they now have built in HDR as seen in some other DSLR's (Canon 5D mark3 for example). I am probably more interested in the lens though. I can't wait to see comparisons to the Panasonic 12-35mm. The Panasonic is very good, so the comparison will be interesting.
Hopefully the continuous focus AF will benefit from the on-sensor PDAF. A real test will be to focus on fast moving objects in low light (dancers). Improved high-ISO performance would be a plus.
The Oly 35-100mm f/2.0 lens looks to be right up my dance alley assuming that the PDAF continuous tracking is any good.
I'm interested in the electronic shutter... could be the 'revolutionary' bit.
The extra room provided by the grip should help the feel too. Can't wait to try this with my Hexanon 57mm f1.2... hopefully we can have focus peaking at last (come on, let's have the E-M5 firmware update with it!)
1 Member(s) liked this post
Rumor mills also expect a 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO lens to be announced as well!
Splendid days! (playing too much Candy Crush)
lookin' nice. :-)
Yes, good timing for me... I held off the Lumix 12-35/35-100 and these two lenses have great potential.
Still haven't given my latest purchase any decent exercise yet... so no rush here
After using the OMD for 6 months hoping to replace my DSLR, I am selling it and getting the 5D2 back. The tiny shutter lag, the latency in the EVF, the half second delay in playback, slow lenses, just dont' cut it for me. I love the size but after the zoom lens (I have the pancake zoom too but hate the electronic zoom) it is pretty big.
It feels almost liberating when I picked up another canon's ungainly body. Reminds me of what I've been missing.
Well. The OMD already makes a grand companion to my Leica ff kit. This looks like 43 finally coming of age. I'll be joining the Q
Just this guy you know
Both the camera body and the lens sound brilliant. However, I'm a little worried about the size and weight. For me, the whole concept of m43 is about a great compromise between size and IQ. When the body and lens size start approaching APS-C DSLR territory, I start questioning the point. Even the 12-50mm kit zoom is a little long for my taste physically. And now this.
Believe me, the OMD with either the mZuiko 75-300 or Panny G 100-300 on is a whole lot smaller and lighter than the equivalent FF or APS-C DSLR!!
With my old Sony A77 or A900 with Sony 75-400 lens or Sigma 150-500 lens I needed a body harness system to support both bulk and weight.
With the OMD's I can take two with me for all day shoots both suspended around my neck. One fitted with a long zoom, usually the heavier Panny 100-300, the other with a mZuiko 14-150. The IBIS works perfectly for long focal lengths, so I get sharper shots than with my old DSLR set up and I don't get tired.
By the way I will never see 73 again either!
So what will this new Oy OMD give me.... hopefully dual PDAF/Contrast AF which will allow me to get fast action, which contrast detect on it's own just can't get or if I am lucky perhaps once in a hundred shots!!
www.simmondsphotography.com4 Member(s) liked this post
Admittedly, I got the tennis elbow carrying the K-5 wrist-wrapped for a long weekend last year. Haven't tried if that would happen with the E-M5.
I have consider changing my m4/3 gear for a Pentax kit though...
Hm.... WRT size and weight:
I am using the EM5 with kit zoom and some primes (Leica 25, Oly 45 and 17 etc) as well as the K5 with 18-135. I must say that there is a significant size difference (and also some weight difference but not as much). I would say WRT seize & weight m43 clearly wins. If it comes to ease of handling and overall usage experience, for me the K5 is the clear winner.
So how will that spoil down to the expected EM1 and 12-40 and rumored 40-150 2.8 lenses? Cannot say but I believe even there the m43 will be lighter and smaller - would say the clear winner if easier carrying is the preferred thing.
If it comes to haptics and overall handling I still believe I would prefer the K5 with lenses. Actually some fast Pentax Limited primes (15, 21, 35, 43, 70 or 77) paired with a 4/16-45 and 4-5.8/55-300 will give a pretty much great flexible set with a final range from 23 - 450 (in FF terms) with reasonable high speed. And DOF will for sure be equal or better with Pentax APSC compared to m43 (see attached images).
On paper m43 will have the advantage of more reach with less weight if using the Oly 75-300, but again DOF will not be as good. So all is pretty on par finally. And depends if one prefers OVF or EVF end of the day. Currently it looks that I am preferring Pentax
All 3 shots with Pentax K5IIs and the "cheap" 18-135 wide open at 135 (equals 200mm in FF terms) - actually what a wonderful system
But as of state of today I am pretty satisfied withe the K5II and K5IIs AF performance and the EM1 would need to be a lot improved over the EM5, so that I would give it a try just because of AF.
The funny thing for me, tho, is that I hardly use AF for anything fast moving. I only use it as a convenience on easy to lock in subjects when shooting casually ... Accuracy is much more important to me than speed. Even the E-1 system, with only three AF sensor points, seems to work fast enough in most lighting to fulfill my desires. Otherwise I prefer manually focusing my lenses. :-)
Also for me the current AF speed of the EM5 and the K5IIs are sufficient. I very seldom miss the AF of my D800E
What really counts for me how easy a camera overall is to handle. And here the K5IIs is the clear winner so far. Maybe with the new EM1 it will become a different story - there is hope
No one camera will make everyone smile. :-)
But I miss the Nikon matrix metering a lot where I got spot on light 99% of the time, and you could turn around and just fire away (but pictures were often somehow a bit dull in appearence), but even a D600 is awfull big and intruding.
I have just read one of the numerous rumour sites which indicated that phase detect AF would only be available for Zuiko 4/3 lenses which are designed for Phase detect AF. http://www.echenique.com/?p=2172
If this is right then users of mZuiko lenses will be no better off!
Very early days yet, but at the moment that would be a show stopper for me!
If I had to buy 4/3 lenses which would put the bulk and weight of my gear up just to more easily get action shots, then I would seriously consider going back to a DSLR instead. There are some very good smaller DSLR's around now which are cheaper than this new Oly!
Last edited by dhsimmonds; 30th August 2013 at 00:01. Reason: Added internet link
I don't care what gear I have.
Things I sell: http://www.shutterstock.com/sets/413...html?rid=611051 Member(s) liked this post
Constant f2.8 aperture. Veeeery nice.
It will be hard to hold back on this one... but considering the brand new sensor, new focusing mechanism, electronic shutter - there will be plenty of scope for teething problems
Still, I think I'm ready to take the lead on this one!
Electronic shutter? Haven't heard that rumor yet (so far only in Panasonic models).
I wasn't a fan of the look in the original leaked images, but the official images show a more balanced design. The grip still looks kind of glued-on to me though. But if it works ergonomically, that's all that matters.
Latest rumour suggests HDR function will make use of an electronic shutter - I think it's likely.
Lots of buttons... thats what i like ....
1 Member(s) liked this post
Ouch, video specs are posted on 43rumors as limited to 30p. No 24p or even 25p for PAL seems just silly. It's too bad because the 5-axis IS does a great job stabilizing video.
I don't care what gear I have.
Things I sell: http://www.shutterstock.com/sets/413...html?rid=611052 Member(s) liked this post
Last edited by Godfrey; 3rd September 2013 at 22:34.
I do not care much about video, so the EM1 video capabilities should be enough. The photographic part of the EM1 for my use seems to be far better than any other M43 camera, so I guess I will be able to survive with the EM1 alone.
Actually after many experiences with great cameras and systems (Pentax, Fuji, etc) I will give the EM1 (plus my old EM5) and m43 a try as my main camera system and only keep the D800E and some selected lenses for really demanding and high resolution work. At least I will try
It will be interesting to see how this all plays out.
Not long to wait now. Tuesday 10th September here in the UK it will be launched with local presentations in Olympus dealers throughout the following two weeks.
My local dealer has an Oly EM1 day on 28th September and is hopeful of having stock at that time.
I sold my 11-22 when the mZD 9-18 came out, and the Lumix 7-14 is also a strong performer. Even the ZD 12-60 could be challenged by this new 12-40mm f2.8 pro lens for m4/3rds (please Olympus, more like 45mm f1.8 and 75mm f1.8 in terms of image quality)
I can't wait to try both cameras, and see which feels the best fit - Panasonic certainly got the form factor right - but I love Olympus kit.
I'm 100% with Godfrey with regards to the 11-22 (which I regrettably sold). It covers four important, classic focal lengths for me, 21, 28, 35 and 50mm (compressed to 22, 28, 35 and 44mm, but still).
I would rate the ZD 50-200mm f2.8-3.5 and ZD 50mm f2 as more important lenses which would drive one towards the E-M1.
While a wonderful lens, the 11-22mm range has been covered by the mZD 9-18 for me, and the mZD 12-40 f2.8 will be an extremely flexible range too.
The "normal" zooms have never appealed to me. The 12-60 always felt unbalanced and I didn't like the wave-shaped rectilinear distortion at the wide end. I'd rather have a Summilux or Voigtländer 25 and the 35 Macro in that range.
The 11-22 is special ... comparing its rendering and performance against the 9-18, it produces results more to my liking. Astonishing resolution, virtually no rectilinear distortion once past 16mm, and even below that it's all simple, spherical distortion that's easy to deal with. And weathersealed, solid, precise. ;-)
Different strokes. For me, the 11-22 and 35 Macro are 90% of what I use. Add a Summicron-R 50 and 90 for a bit more reach, add a fast wide (17/1.8) or normal (25/1.4) prime: that's my whole kit.
Godfrey - GDGPhoto Flickr Stream1 Member(s) liked this post