I do shoot in RAW and I do find it helpful sometimes to 'see' in b & w (as I do with my 5D occasionally), but expect to get a 'neutral' color file and process my own b & w from the RAW file.
When we are discussing formats, I hadn't tried it, but just did in 16:9--and the RAW is cropped and the EXIF shows that in LR (4000 x 2250). As I understood it, the GH1 has the larger sensor so that the size of the shot will be, size wise, the same as the 4000 x 3000--IOW--I assume then that it will be same overall--but wouldn't think it would be 4000 by 4000--or am I wrong here??
Diane
When we are discussing formats, I hadn't tried it, but just did in 16:9--and the RAW is cropped and the EXIF shows that in LR (4000 x 2250). As I understood it, the GH1 has the larger sensor so that the size of the shot will be, size wise, the same as the 4000 x 3000--IOW--I assume then that it will be same overall--but wouldn't think it would be 4000 by 4000--or am I wrong here??
Diane
If you're shooting in raw format, the color is still there even when you've got the camera set to B&W mode. You get to view B&W in the camera to check for tonal mergers etc. -- but if you later decide a color image would have been better, you can re-process the raw file as color instead.
(Adobe Lightroom, which is what I use for managing raw files, doesn't even recognize the G1's B&W-mode flag -- it displays the images as color unless you explicitly change them to grayscale.)
Another advantage to raw format for B&W shooting is that you can post-apply the same kinds of effects you'd normally get with a filter over the lens: If you want green foliage to look brighter, you can boost the greens, or cut back the blue to make clouds stand out more (same as using a yellow filter) etc. I've recently discovered that this technique also can be used to make high-ISO B&W images appear less noisy; by tweaking the individual color controls, you often can find an optimum setting that minimizes overall noise.