... if you use 3rd party batteries !
... if you use 3rd party batteries !
Thanks for your reminding. But I think it can't detect all of them, I believe.
Excellent information !
My 2 third party accus arrived just a week ago, I'm quite happy with them till now, but early time to tell of course.
Lets just hope Panasonic will not include this firmware update in future important updates !
Anyway, what's the good of updating a camera or a lens, if you are happy with the way it works before !
E-M1/GH2/G1 Full Spectrum & lots of lenses
Another reason to not buy Panasonic anymore....
In the next steps you will see Panasonic providing a digital code to all its electronic equipment of G1+GH1. Only original mics will work and only original SDHC cards will record on that system. Oh boy that is poor....
I cherish all my children Panasonic and Olympus too, even when one of them sometimes makes a dumb mistake!
I feel strongly about, but how do I avoid buying the only camera which does what I want? I wish there was another method of sending them a message.
Next thing they'll set in a counter for usages and say "no go with more than 100 charges"
I'm starting to think some camera companies doing with batteries what printer companies have done with ink. Make it where you have to buy their brand.
While I don't appreciate mandating proprietary marketing, I'm really not all that worked up about this battery issue. I purchased an extra Panasonic battery for my G1 from B&H for $69.00, and I'm satisfied that I don't have to concern myself with the functionality of a third-party battery that may or may not work properly and safely. Just not that big a deal to me.
- my Flash,
- all my Cameras (no matter which two I might take)
- my portable light box,
- my toothbrush
- interior camp light
and I only need one charger (which I can cycle batteries in). Its just one more bit of gear to take and people underestimate just how good AA NiMH batteries are.
I agree completely. It would be wonderful if everything ran on AAs.
My point was limited to the fact that the G1 takes a specific battery, and (since I obtained just one extra) I purchased the Panasonic battery even before all this drama erupted. I tend not to trust off brand batteries. I'm sure some are perfectly good ... but you don't know you have a bad one until it's ruined your camera or caught fire.
If I take my full kit on a long road trip have to deal with the following battery gear:
2 Canon BP511 chargers
1 M8 charger
1 R-D1 Charger
1 Ricoh GR-DII charger
1 charger for the Macbook
1 four way spliter for in car charging.
1 six outlet power strip when in a motel.
never in my life seen or known anyone who's ever had that happen. I personally think its a myth distributed by the makers.I tend not to trust off brand batteries. I'm sure some are perfectly good ... but you don't know you have a bad one until it's ruined your camera or caught fire.
I do know of the Dell and Mac overcharging issue on some laptops, but that was the charging circuit, which is not in the camera. So at worst you might have to fear a melt down of your charger. (*and I do have some qualifications and experience in electronics, so I'm not just an uninformed opinion)
Today I read in another forum of someone, who has two 3rd party batteries - they last longer than original battery
My Storetek batteries take a larger change and last longer then the two canon batteries did in the 5D.
Only politics can regulate and force companys to stopp this mess of different adapters, inkcartridges and cellphoneplugs. But the it is cheaper to throw your printer away when there is a little problem. My last Canon printer costs € 30,-- cheaper then the B/W and colourgartridge together. Etc etc.
When you walk around on dumpmarkets you can find piles of phonechargers with their different little plugs. Talking about extra waste and the environment.
It' exclusivity on the wrong grounds.
Nothing to do about it, we will have to keep on lugging all those different neccesitys around.
I sympathize with you all.
this Nikon episode, and that was with the maker's own battery! So I'd think it's certainly possible for it to happen with third-party batteries as well.
Ah, chargers, but until recently I was in better shape--all my Canons took the same batteries. Then, of course, laptop, phones, PDA (sometimes). Now I have to add the G1 also, but the Canon's chargers fold up smallish at least. Not so bad.
I've had good luck with printers--my 3800 is several years old and going strong and I still have my 2200 working if I need it. My old 1280 was given to Habitat for Humanity store with a few carts as I have with other non-photo printers in the past. We have given old cells/chargers to women's groups that work with the providers to give them to abused women. I try to recycle--but its tough. I don't see any standardization on the horizon so I guess we'll have to continue to do our best and push for changes.
That little game messed up a lot of us who use B&W carbon inks on (ahem) printers.
Seriously, it's a good idea to know if your battery has proper safety circuits to prevent shorts that would cause it to burst into flame. And there are countries (double ahem) where such concerns would be low on their priority list (adding poisonous substances to baby formula comes to mind). But this sounds to me like leveraging the customer's safety concerns to enhance the revenue stream... (triple ahem).
Well, I was waiting for an update that would address the kludginess with focussing manual lenses on the G1, and instead they bring us this nasty attempt at avoiding prize competition on their extremely expensive "original" battery packs....
I feel like someone just slapped my face with a beer-soaked towel...
Why, oh why would a nice manufacturer suddenly adopt Epson´s unpleasant practice with their d-mn chipped cartridges?
And don´t give us that nonsense about risk of fire: there have been instances, but just as often with "original" packs; they´re not any safer than most independents....
This was using alkaline batteries ... and it was the flash.
I'd never have thought it had the capacity for a house fire if you'd have asked me either!
someone has calculated that ink consumption (original ink) is ~ five times as expensive as the printer's price.
Perhaps Panasonic should sell their batteries for $ 500 ....
har, har, har, har ....
Hot, I went through >2000 listings on eBay but can't find that battery you show.
Could you provide a link? Thanks!
I did search for the battery that you showed. The links you give here are not for them either?
Where did you buy the "SIDO", 1400 mAH, 7.2V battery?
It's the first link
Thanks! Ordered some.
It would be useful to everyone if you could compare the original and the knock-off in terms of performance (how many frames approximately with full charge and the like).
I will when I get mine.
BTW, there something odd about the battery prices in the Netherlands (perhaps true for the EU zone as well?). Every damn battery in a shop is 3-5X times the price from eBay or online shops, even for the very same ones.
If you buy nonames - f.e. at amazon marketplace - you also pay 20-30 €.
From Honkong the price is € 9.35, including wrapping & porto (~ HK$ 7) - so the dealer gets ~ € 8 . Delivery takes 4-6 days.
It's funny, Panasonics batteries are (also) "Made in China" .. perhaps they come out from the same machine :-}
Since years I use my Canon-nonames for € 4.99, always working well. Often shipping is more expensive than battery :-)
Some of the batteries can be actually from exactly the same manufacturer and machine.
It is known to be a common practice to produce extra volume of product, in addition to the order from Panasonic, and called them 'rejected'. Those so called 'rejected' will later be shipped to another shop to put a different label/brand on and go to the market. The owner of the factory may not even know about the 'rejects'.
If you worry about buying things from China, you may as well make your own products .
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Got them. Thanks, hot!
Works as well as the original (perhaps better, I will go through one charge to compare..)
USER: Hello, Panasonic? My camera seems to be all melty. Obviously a manufacturing defect. Please replace it immediately under warranty.
PANA: Sorry, it's not our responsibility. You were using a third-party battery which had internal resistance that did not meet our specifications, causing it to overheat.
USER: But the batteries look exactly the same!
PANA: You can't measure internal resistance by looking. That's why we put out a firmware update that disables use of third-party batteries.
USER: I know, but I didn't install it because I wanted to be able to use third-party batteries. They might be exactly the same as the manufacturer battery. They might even have come from exactly the same plant. It says so on the Internet, and the Internet doesn't lie!
PANA: Whatever. But by putting out a firmware update and a warning, we expressly directed against use of third-party batteries. We consider disregard of our directions to be abuse, so we do not consider the damage to be covered by your warranty.
USER: You mean just because I didn't update my firmware and disregarded your warning, you are going to ignore my complaint?
PANA: We mean that if you use non-approved batteries, you're on your own, pal.
USER: Well, I think you are big poopy heads! You should honor your warranty no matter what people do to their cameras. I am going to hire a lawyer and sue you.
PANA: Why pay to hire a lawyer when you can get great legal advice on the Internet for free?
USER: You think I'd be stupid enough to use cheap, cut-rate legal advice I found on the Internet?
PANA: Sheesh. [click]
I wonder if Olympus disables 3rd party PS BLS-1 knock offs.
Perhaps the E-P is impervious to the Panasoic meltdown?
Actually people are having problem on the E-P1 as the knock off batteries aren't fitting into the camera properly.
Terry, I am sure there are knock offs that fit. I have not experienced any problems with the 3rds party batteries I have on the E-410.
FWIW, my current G1 has lost two of the lens contacts during one experiment. So, no worries about AF or OIS blowing up.