Fun with the Fuji X ___!

[Rich M]

Landscape with the 35 1.4

R

 

[The Smoking Camera]

Very nice Rich. In camera BW or post?

 

[Jolly]

I just bought the 60mm and so I completed the set.

I thought it was a macro lens not a microscope

 

[Braeside]

I processed this using the Fuji raw converter but it only outputs 8bit & Adobe RGB to generate a tiff for PS. I'd rather produce 16bit ProPhotoRGB raws and so maybe I need to look at RPP or Silkypix for that until we have ACR support.

Graham RAW file converter EX (Powered by SilkyPix) has a development option of 16 bit TIFF AdobeRGB. Under Development menu - Settings for developed image...

 

[Ario Arioldi]

Graham RAW file converter EX (Powered by SilkyPix) has a development option of 16 bit TIFF AdobeRGB. Under Development menu - Settings for developed image...

And ProPhoto RGB color space is not an available option neither in Silkpix nor in RPP.

 

[scho]

Landscape with the 35 1.4

R

Beautiful Rich. Looks almost like infrared.

 

[Rich M]

Very nice Rich. In camera BW or post?

Joe.....done in post.

Beautiful Rich. Looks almost like infrared.

Thanks Carl.....that was the effect I was going for.

The original jpeg was flat due to all the greens, but the sensor/lens combo held a lot of detail when viewed in greyscale (and more aptly reflected what I saw when I took the picture).
Converted in SEP2 from jpeg.

R

 

[Vivek]

35/1.4 Raw developed in RPP

Ario, The greens do not look natural.

 

[Ario Arioldi]

Ario, The greens do not look natural.

Agree, are darker and more saturated than normal, too much for my taste.
The color film simulation I have used in this case is the V50 (Velvia) but the actual purpose of the shot was to search for artifacts and aliasing.

 

[GrahamWelland]

Agree, are darker and more saturated than normal, too much for my taste.
The color film simulation I have used in this case is the V50 (Velvia) but the actual purpose of the shot was to search for artifacts and aliasing.

Interesting that you folks think that these greens aren't natural. They exhibit the typical 'blue' green that velvia normally produces vs the yellowish greens that most DSLRs seem to favor, Canon in particular.

I guess it's a matter of taste. I'm not a fan of punchy bright yellowish greens so I guess there's my bias.

 

[tom in mpls]

Interesting that you folks think that these greens aren't natural. They exhibit the typical 'blue' green that velvia normally produces vs the yellowish greens that most DSLRs seem to favor, Canon in particular.

I guess it's a matter of taste. I'm not a fan of punchy bright yellowish greens so I guess there's my bias.

I like it. Funny how "natural" color can be so hard to assess.

 

[woodyspedden]

Interesting that you folks think that these greens aren't natural. They exhibit the typical 'blue' green that velvia normally produces vs the yellowish greens that most DSLRs seem to favor, Canon in particular.

I guess it's a matter of taste. I'm not a fan of punchy bright yellowish greens so I guess there's my bias.

Nice Lee. I like the K64 version best.

Carl

I am just picking up my X1P today. I understand that you have a profile for the RPP and I was wondering if you could help me with how to install this.

Contact me at [email protected]

Thanks in advance for your help

Woody

 

[Vivek]

Interesting that you folks think that these greens aren't natural. They exhibit the typical 'blue' green that velvia normally produces vs the yellowish greens that most DSLRs seem to favor, Canon in particular.

I guess it's a matter of taste. I'm not a fan of punchy bright yellowish greens so I guess there's my bias.

I have shot with Velvia and had to always expose it "correctly" to get the greens right. Never liked that blue green green. Unnatural.

 

[Terry]

Well you can always:

1)shoot raw and develop to taste in camera
2)shoot a film bracket with multiple choices

That way you can see what you like best.





.

 

[Ario Arioldi]

Carl

I am just picking up my X1P today. I understand that you have a profile for the RPP and I was wondering if you could help me with how to install this.

Contact me at [email protected]

Thanks in advance for your help

Woody

To install an ICC profile in RPP ypu have to copy it into library/application support/RPP/profiles after that it will be available in the drop down menù under Profiles whenever you open a raw file.
If you whish you can also try this profile I have created, the one I normally use:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11389216/FUJIFILM X-Pro1 ISO200 _cloudy.icc

 

[The Smoking Camera]

Lovely image Jolly.
Great shot Graham.
Rich, definitely looks IRish.
Carl, keep up the wonderful posts.
Ario, I may have to try RPP soon.
Matt, very nicely done.
Sorry, for forgetting others, but I can't keep up with this thread.

 

[scho]

A split tone monochrome from the Arboretum series with the XP1. This was using the 60mm.

 

[The Smoking Camera]

A split tone monochrome from the Arboretum series with the XP1. This was using the 60mm.

Carl, this is beautiful.
Can you enlighten me on your split tone monochrome process. Thanks.

 

[GrahamWelland]

Yosemite Falls under the light of the super moon. Basically still noise free!

X-Pro1 18mm 6min @ f/4 ISO 200

 

[Terry]

I even can figure out which way is north
Well done. Looks like Yosemite was the place to be for the moon. I was along the coast and it was too hazy.