Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Not sure exactly which you're referring to -- the darker blue is probably specular reflection from a very dark blue sky, the lighter blue is the copper under the chrome corroding. The knob protrusions are also out of the focus plane so reflections off of them are blurred too.1. Wondering what blue artefacts are on knob protrusions
As I said with the image -- shutter bounce in the first frame due to using 1/13th sec shutter speed. We had a thread on this a while back where i explained I avoided 1/15th like the plague specifically because of shutter bounce. So much, I rarely use even 1/8th or 1/30th, preferring either slower or faster. But since I had a request for both full ISO 400 and binned ISO 1600, this is what you got. It was a quickie noise test and not a resolution test.2. Wondering why image is so soft since lens is so sharp..
Same lens, focus setting did not change between the first and second frame. Only thing that did change is the binning, the ISO going up two stops and the shutter speed increasing two stops to 1/50th.3. Think that the high ISO IQ is nothing short of amazing.
Top left knob protrusion has a very dark blue line against it - was just wondering what that might be..I can also see a slight magenta caste on the body of the same knob - again maybe evening sunset reflection..Not sure exactly which you're referring to -- the darker blue is probably specular reflection from a very dark blue sky, the lighter blue is the copper under the chrome corroding. The knob protrusions are also out of the focus plane so reflections off of them are blurred too.
the shutter issue @ those speeds is 'interesting' I remember the thread very well..As I said with the image -- shutter bounce in the first frame due to using 1/13th sec shutter speed. We had a thread on this a while back where i explained I avoided 1/15th like the plague specifically because of shutter bounce. So much, I rarely use even 1/8th or 1/30th, preferring either slower or faster. But since I had a request for both full ISO 400 and binned ISO 1600, this is what you got. It was a quickie noise test and not a resolution test.
I am (literally) very impressed with the IQ at the high ISO setting..Same lens, focus setting did not change between the first and second frame. Only thing that did change is the binning, the ISO going up two stops and the shutter speed increasing two stops to 1/50th.
Jeeze, you big guys are scary ... here I am losing inches off my height because all the cartilage in my knees is gone (sports sins of youth).I'll also point out that while Don is taller than I am by about an inch, I outweigh him by maybe 20 pounds AND I'm meaner :ROTFL:
Well, they came through for you Guy ... one system to do as much as possible.Like the 1600 very well. Exactly what GUY needs and binned also. I really like the idea of having a binned 1600 in a small file. For some of my work absolutely all I need and WANT.
... wow. Actually, given the amount of resolution, I wouldn't hesitate to use 400 if I know i weren't going to be printing huge. It's decently impressive IMO.Bottom line is I wouldn't use ISO 400 on the full sized image unless it was an emergency situation, but nice to know it's not horrible.
Don’t worry Marc we provide stools for people to stand on so we can see them and at the same time make you appear taller. Now you know how Ken feels! :ROTFL:Jeeze, you big guys are scary ... here I am losing inches off my height because all the cartilage in my knees is gone (sports sins of youth).
Gotta get some lifts if I want to hang around you dudes, or I'll look like a midget with a big camera. :ROTFL:
-Marc
Pete:Top left knob protrusion has a very dark blue line against it - was just wondering what that might be..I can also see a slight magenta caste on the body of the same knob - again maybe evening sunset reflection..
sorry maybe I have become super conscious of these issues - especially in backs I am considering buying - because truth be told I am very frustrated with the H3D11-39 on the technical camera..
Shelby,... wow. Actually, given the amount of resolution, I wouldn't hesitate to use 400 if I know i weren't going to be printing huge. It's decently impressive IMO.
For me (and I'll never own a p65+ due to $$$), I'd be interested in a comparison between a iso400 full-res shot and a binned 1600 shot up-res'd to match the full sized iso400.
I caught that!Yea and he is shorter than me, poor guy.:ROTFL::ROTFL::ROTFL:
SO Don is 6'-10"? I thought he was 6'-8" -- my apologiesI caught that!
Actually, Don is three inches taller than Jack.
No I'm only 6-9SO Don is 6'-10"? I thought he was 6'-8" -- my apologies
Is that now, or when you were 25? :ROTFL: I know I've shrunk almost an inch too Marc!No I'm only 6-9
I don't think I'm shrinking as a matter of fact my waist is growing!Is that now, or when you were 25? :ROTFL: I know I've shrunk almost an inch too Marc!
Seriously, if you're 6-9 that makes you 2-3/4 taller than I am now. Was 6-7 at my peak, but have shrunk back to 6-61/4