Guy Mancuso
Administrator, Instructor
Lol I know I was just giving you a hard time but yea. Lets get Bob to do it. Lol
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Jack have you compared 105 DC to 135 DC?Two words, though admittedly off-topic -- 105 DC. (The most under-rated and under-utilized "look" lens in the Nikon lineup!)
I suspected that. While my 135 DC seems to resolve enough wide open at DC 0 setting, it doesn't really impress it terms of microcontrast. Perhaps the design has some residual softness even at neutral setting.Lars,
In my experiences with multiple samples of each, the 105 DC had the edge in shapness accross the frame. These comparative results were as a result on testing with various Nikon 12MP ful frame cameras.
Dave (D&A)
Jack,IMHO...
It's pretty clear by the MTF's: While the 1.4G and 1.4D are pretty close on center performance with the G just slightly superior, the 1.4G is far superior on edge and corner performance as compared to the D version. What this means is perhaps that for portraits only, the softer-edged D version may be desirable -- and again I'd argue that you can't beat the 105DC for portraits. However, as an all-around imaging lens with the latest Nikon digital bodies, I don't think it's even a discussion as to which 85/1.4 is the "best" lens; the G wins hands-down.
+1! Little else needs to be said!The 200 f 2 is just the most gorgeous lens. Loved it for portraits.
I need to rob the bank again and get it again. Maybe next years expense. I miss it too much. Problem is nothing like it in that range.
i was figuring i'd grab the D used, and pocket about $600 all said and done. the new price is ridic. i figured i'd see people's opinions and decide if $600 was worth what i'd be sacrificing. i'm starting to really think it's not. the G really is fantastic. i've just been feeling cheap lately. haha.Getting back to the original OP's question...
The 85mm 1.4 G is probably one of Nikon's best designs. It rates pretty high up there in the MTF charts at 5.6 and the OOF areas are quite good too. The AF is fast with the newer nano coated optics, better designed for todays sensors. Take into consideration what you'd get for you 1.4G, used, to a 1.4D new, and if the savings are worth it. Personally, I'd keep the 85mm 1.4g. I sold my 105 DC because of better AF and contrast. For portraits, my next choice would be the 200mm F.2.
Better than feeling poor...i've just been feeling cheap lately.
Me too, on the 200 f/2!i was figuring i'd grab the D used, and pocket about $600 all said and done. the new price is ridic. i figured i'd see people's opinions and decide if $600 was worth what i'd be sacrificing. i'm starting to really think it's not. the G really is fantastic. i've just been feeling cheap lately. haha.
i'd love a 200/2...but that price tag. ayayay!