I guess it also comes down to the type of photography.
For example it is quite a difference if you want to take images of someone sitting near still at a table vs. taking images of kids unpacking presents under the Christmas tree.
The other thing is DOF and if you are forced to almost allways shoot wide open as soons as the light is not that bright.
So I think I would allways own one additional camera for really low light, but I think the percentage how often I wouldcould use the S-system would benefit from 1-1.5 stop better ISO.
I have had quite some situations (lets say during daylight but inside where I just got in the 1/30-1/60 range at f2.5 and only got part of the images due to those limitations.
The more I think about the more I believe to would really benefit from the new S....but the cost for "updating" is steep.
But then you also get the 3 year warranty and you also have a higher value, so in the end one doesnt "loose" the full update cost.
At least I am not in a hurry.
For example it is quite a difference if you want to take images of someone sitting near still at a table vs. taking images of kids unpacking presents under the Christmas tree.
The other thing is DOF and if you are forced to almost allways shoot wide open as soons as the light is not that bright.
So I think I would allways own one additional camera for really low light, but I think the percentage how often I wouldcould use the S-system would benefit from 1-1.5 stop better ISO.
I have had quite some situations (lets say during daylight but inside where I just got in the 1/30-1/60 range at f2.5 and only got part of the images due to those limitations.
The more I think about the more I believe to would really benefit from the new S....but the cost for "updating" is steep.
But then you also get the 3 year warranty and you also have a higher value, so in the end one doesnt "loose" the full update cost.
At least I am not in a hurry.