I was shooting along the Potomac River last week and took these two images,
one with the D3x, Zeiss 85MM and the other with the M9 and an older pre-pre-asph 90MM Summicron. The photos were taken 17 minutes apart, so the angle of the sun changed a bit. I think I like the skin tones and the background as rendered by the Leica better. I think the buildings as rendered by the Nikon might be more neutral. I think the Leica may have a bit more punch, but I'd love everyone's thoughts.
6:45 was the Nikon
7:02 was the Leica
one with the D3x, Zeiss 85MM and the other with the M9 and an older pre-pre-asph 90MM Summicron. The photos were taken 17 minutes apart, so the angle of the sun changed a bit. I think I like the skin tones and the background as rendered by the Leica better. I think the buildings as rendered by the Nikon might be more neutral. I think the Leica may have a bit more punch, but I'd love everyone's thoughts.
6:45 was the Nikon
7:02 was the Leica
Last edited: