dmabry2010
New member
Hello!
As I had posted earlier, I took a bunch of lenses with me on our 20th anniversary cruise. I also converted from an M8 to an M9.
Now that I am back, I have been reconfiguring my lens kit to reflect what I learned and adjust for the M9.
I took with me a WATE 16-18-21. Of the three settings on the M9, I prefered the 21mm. Especially for interior shots. But, the f4 was slow, especially where flash was not allowed.
Since returning, I sold the WATE and am now looking for a faster 21mm, probably the f2.8.
I am trying to get feedback to compare the Elmarit-M and the Zeiss Biogon. In reading the literature, the Zeiss Biogon gets great reviews and has been complimented for minimal distortion.
I will be shooting interiors (where I think distortion matters) and landscape (where perhaps distortion is not as much an issue).
Thank you for any insight you may offer.
Michael
As I had posted earlier, I took a bunch of lenses with me on our 20th anniversary cruise. I also converted from an M8 to an M9.
Now that I am back, I have been reconfiguring my lens kit to reflect what I learned and adjust for the M9.
I took with me a WATE 16-18-21. Of the three settings on the M9, I prefered the 21mm. Especially for interior shots. But, the f4 was slow, especially where flash was not allowed.
Since returning, I sold the WATE and am now looking for a faster 21mm, probably the f2.8.
I am trying to get feedback to compare the Elmarit-M and the Zeiss Biogon. In reading the literature, the Zeiss Biogon gets great reviews and has been complimented for minimal distortion.
I will be shooting interiors (where I think distortion matters) and landscape (where perhaps distortion is not as much an issue).
Thank you for any insight you may offer.
Michael