peterb
Member
:ROTFL:
How many Noctilux 50/0.95 users are there and how many pictures taken with that lens have been ooohed and ahhhed over by non Noctilux or non Leica owners?
Vivek, true dat.
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
:ROTFL:
How many Noctilux 50/0.95 users are there and how many pictures taken with that lens have been ooohed and ahhhed over by non Noctilux or non Leica owners?
But don't forget that the name "Finepix" covers not just point & shoots but also Fuji's S1, S3 and S5 which were based on Nikon DSLRs. I believe the S3 and S5 were highly regarded by some photographers, and some would like Fuji to continue making Nikon-based DSLRs. Some wedding & portrait photographers chose the Fuji versions over their Nikon siblings because of image quality. So it seems that this little X100 is promising better image quality than even some very good Fuji Finepix predecessors.The synergy of the two produces the best image quality in the HISTORY OF FINEPIX cameras..."
Uh...I'm sorry but that's not saying much.
While I was aware that their 'flagships' were Nikon-friendly they seemed to be rarely supported. They made a body for sure. And I don't know of any lenses of note. The last major camera they did seemed to be years ago and I'm not sure it was received all that well (although it's possible that people in their demographics probably thought, "well if it's like a Nikon why not get a Nikon?") Judging by their offerings it seemed like they pulled back from anything really substantial like a DSLR. Most of the time they seemed to be cranking out moderately priced 'bridge' cameras. As a result I just never got the sense that they were not a major player in digital beyond the P/S cameras. If anything they're the ones who make processing equipment and special applications.But don't forget that the name "Finepix" covers not just point & shoots but also Fuji's S1, S3 and S5 which were based on Nikon DSLRs. I believe the S3 and S5 were highly regarded by some photographers, and some would like Fuji to continue making Nikon-based DSLRs. Some wedding & portrait photographers chose the Fuji versions over their Nikon siblings because of image quality. So it seems that this little X100 is promising better image quality than even some very good Fuji Finepix predecessors.
I saw a few mentions of that. Didn't realize Fuji was making lenses for Hassy. That's good to know. Thanks (and also thanks to other posters who'd also mentioned that).The S5 is a remarkable camera .... I still use it, not frequently though.
Musn't forget that fuji also did quite a few Hassleblad lenses, which were optically top lenses in my perception anyway
Last time I checked the X1 was as big as a brick compared to other compacts. Small compared to a pro dslr or a M9, but not Small. I would not put it In the compact category.The X100 looks like an amazing camera and seems to offer an array of bells and whistles but the one box it doesn't tick is [] compact camera.
The key reason I still plan to buy an X1 is that it still the best quality compact in town.
But it lacks one very important feature … interchangeable lenses.what is interesting about this camera for me is that it has a lot of the features that many wanted in the M8, features which Leica omitted- for example, side loading card slot, usb port, instead of the removable baseplate--an evf overlay instead of the trd. leica framelines, more dedicated buttons on the back vs. leica's somewhat minimal approach--
Very nice indeed. Has anyone else noticed how clean the viewfinder interface looks - gorgeous! The typography, both on the LCD and viewfinder, is perfect.