just curious what others are doing as a standard iso setting.
does one try to keep the iso down as much as possible to say 160 iso or is it not even a concern with digital capture on the M9.
besides the noise at the higher iso like 1600, is there anything lost by capturing at 800 iso as opposed to 160iso?
by default from shooting film i'm thinking that if there is enough light 160 iso would yield the best image quality but not sure if that equates in the digital world.
does one try to keep the iso down as much as possible to say 160 iso or is it not even a concern with digital capture on the M9.
besides the noise at the higher iso like 1600, is there anything lost by capturing at 800 iso as opposed to 160iso?
by default from shooting film i'm thinking that if there is enough light 160 iso would yield the best image quality but not sure if that equates in the digital world.