Marc, one of the pitfalls of my not having read the article purposely up to this point, was possibly not fully understanding that her article came under the general heading of an editorial. If that's the case, then most certainly personal views expressed and possibly even endorsements can or may be considered acceptable norms. I guess hypothetically one might question whether someone who holds a position where normally their written views are supposed to be unbiased and without influence from commercial sources, is also allowed in the same or similar publications to express personal views or endorsements under the heading of an editorial. Again my comments were not specifically related to her article but in a general response to some of the postings and views expressed in this thread. That was the intent of my initial length response, to simply question when and where in today's society it is or is not acceptable to express ones personal point of view along with the possibility of providing endorsement for a particular product. Other than that, I agree, no need to make a mountain out of a molehill....which I guess I most certainly provided a helping hand in doing just that!Sara Lee doesn't work for any government as a specific industry overseer.
The article isn't a "news article", it is a Blog post under a sub-heading of Culture > Art and Design > Camera Kit Exposed > Photography Blog.
IMO, on-line Blogs are an euphemism for interactive editorial commentary. Editorials in news vehicles commenting on electronic products or cars or what-ever often offer personal opinions including likes and dislikes. Some reviewers even endorse the product being reviewed by buying it. It was clear in the blog that she bought the ME ... it wasn't given to her by Leica, nor purchased by the Guardian for her.
Mt. Everest from a mole-hill comes to mind.
-Marc
Everyone have a Great New year too!
Dave (D&A)
Last edited: