Actually, if it is metamerism, based on the sensor responding different from the human eye, then it needs to be corrected in the de-matrixing. This would result in the M sensing a different color for an subject in the image, and it would be unsatisfying.
It would NOT affect he 3-d or 'presence' issue that most comment on. It is the latter that tone adjustments and even sharpening can correct (though it would also benefit from better color profiles, since the background color would 'separate' from the subject better, at least as far as human perception is concerned.
Let's face it; all sensors even foveon have problems of bleed; foveon vertically and bayer matrix horizontally. Where green is the sensor filter, the blue (the color that separates best due to higher frequency) and red that spreads out and can bleed, will not be truly 'sensed' at that green pixel point.
I have hypothesized that there IS a difference CMOS to CCD but that there is SO much difference between what a sensor sees and what we see in a DNG file it is not going to show CMOS vs CCD except for some edge effects. (Have you ever seen the actual file output from a sensor? really strange, and the first bayer dematrix step is really bizzare!)
Anyway, who is ready to send their M back (or to MOI!!!
)
regards
Victor