V
Vivek
Guest
"Undulating emotional outcry" :ROTFL:
A pity that it relates to photography where all that gets tied up.
A pity that it relates to photography where all that gets tied up.
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
No. But I will not try to paint it white either.BTW. who cares if Leica makes limited edition cameras? Opps, I guess you are. What if they bring out a (while) white MM? Will you sell your MM because of it? :ROTFL:
At least Mercedes doesn't call the A-class "micro-S-class".I serious doubt it'll hurt the M flagship any more than a $35,000 C Class Mercedes hurts a $150,000 MB, or a $600 Nikon 1 J3 has any effect on a $6,000 D4, ect.
Consumers are well aware that a Brand's equity may be used to promote lesser versions of the product line ... and it hasn't stopped anyone yet.
... But don't let history and logic get in the way of the undulating emotional outcries that seem to accompany anything Leica does.
- Marc
+1!Using the "M" brand might help to sell such cameras, but in a long term it also could hurt the "M" brand.
I think they should have just continued using "M" just for their rangefinder line and also I believe they should have continued their numbering system for the M.
I have the feeling to many marketing people in the game now at Leica (but not enough production people).
There is another possibility which is open to one's own interpretations-I think maxi-M or super-M (SM ) would be even better for the S.
Reading the responses here, there might be a little more excitement for a bunny. And one with a cute little red nose.It'll be interesting to see what this new Leica actually is. Maybe they'll pull a rabbit out of their hats.
Most don't need the illustration to jump to conclusions.:sleep006:And the so-called 'leak' doesn't mention the Mini designation with one word.
Are we jumping into conclusions about what we see in that illustration ?
Actually, no.
And the so-called 'leak' doesn't mention the Mini designation with one word.
Are we jumping into conclusions about what we see in that illustration ?
Most don't need the illustration to jump to conclusions.:sleep006:
I think that should read "Hmm. So on one hand you have this ridiculous "leaked" camera few people on this forum want...".Hmm. So on one hand you have this ridiculous "leaked" camera few people want...
Anger?Hmm. So on one hand you have this ridiculous "leaked" camera few people want... and surely even Leica would not be crazy enough to hype.
And other the other hand, I've paid attention on this forum and others as those who seem closer to Leica have hinted that there is something else and truly "M" related...
Then, even Leica says "come see the truth" on their FB page, implying that what's been leaked is not everything, or not what's really being released.
At the very least, I'm reserving my anger and disappointment for the 11th, and not sooner!
In that case I also see that he would get paid for doing so.Do I see Leonardo DiCaprio carrying one? Absolutely!
Sorry but since the first page of this thread, I have yet to read one meaningful post from you. All what I read is sarcasm and taking jabs at other members. Sorry again for being blunt but I think you should calm down a bit.In that case I also see that he would get paid for doing so.
If few or no one in this forum would want this camera then those defending it by tooth and nail should calm down a bit (or get DiCaprio shooting his grand children posting here. )
Mini Mum.