hi Max
thanks for the clarification. from the way you originally wrote, it seems that you're alluding to the M240 *files* to be "too digital" since you compared M9 files to "medium format digital"...which i don't agree with either (having owned an M9 for a year) but i'm digressing.
i'm not a fan of the new additional features of the M240 either (i have yet to press the "movie" button just out of spite) but to be honest, the new features never got in the way and i find it quite odd for anyone to complain about them. for example, i'd be pissed if Leica puts EVF in the RF window itself...but thankfully they didn't do that.
thanks for the clarification. from the way you originally wrote, it seems that you're alluding to the M240 *files* to be "too digital" since you compared M9 files to "medium format digital"...which i don't agree with either (having owned an M9 for a year) but i'm digressing.
i'm not a fan of the new additional features of the M240 either (i have yet to press the "movie" button just out of spite) but to be honest, the new features never got in the way and i find it quite odd for anyone to complain about them. for example, i'd be pissed if Leica puts EVF in the RF window itself...but thankfully they didn't do that.