Designed by Lenny Kravitz
Lenny who ?
Designed by Lenny Kravitz
Lenny who ?
With best regards, K-H.
Hey, I have a M9 CORRESPONDENT now
My journey into Leica: LeicaLux.com5 Member(s) liked this post
I am offering a service to any Leica owners: I will hand-rub the paint off in key areas. I am charging $10,000 per camera and $5,000 per lens.
Brad Husick3 Member(s) liked this post
All I can say is - the world is really going crazy
Anyway I must admit this camera and lenses look gorgeous
Lenny Kravitz : one-hit wonder.
This part of the blurb intrigues me ;
In italics : do they mean they were sort of made somewhere near Germany?All the components of the set are ‘Made in Germany’.
It looks nice to me too. I don't really know who Lenny Kravitz is, but if it were a standard cosmetic treatment option, I might go for it.
Does it come with ripped jeans?
Someday, in the far, far distant future, Leica will do something so stupid and insulting that even the fanboys will sneer.
1 Member(s) liked this post
were they rubbed my Lenny himself?
Godfrey - GDGPhoto Flickr Stream2 Member(s) liked this post
Mike Johnston doesn't seem thrilled:
The Online Photographer: Not So Cool New Stuff
And it's less than $25,000: http://leicarumors.com/2015/02/24/le...nnounced.aspx/
i think it looks good....
Ok, I don't personally like it. I thought it was going to look different when I read the rumour. Leica should have taken a page from Panerai's limited edition hand-book when it came to making something brass (see PAM382 "Bronzo").
Anyway, you guys can't be serious when you say you don't know who Lenny Kravitz is. I mean, he's not been active for a while (album wise), but he's pretty talented.. Well beyond platinum status in a time when musicians weren't manufactured and **** like platinum mattered.
Anyway, when my cameras start to look like that, I sell them off and buy new ones. I buy black cameras for a reason.
(Note to self... Become famous, shoot with Leica, have them build you a custom camera.)
I will personally use your Leica camera, preferably with a Summicron 50 APO, for a period of 10-15 years to give it a genuine "Correspondent" look. In the meantime, I'll let you use my Olympus OM-3 that already has this look. All this for a super low price of zero dollars
Jokes aside; this was bound to happen. In the "old" days, real cameras looked used. Nowadays, people change cameras too often for that to happen, and the result is that Leica can make a few bucks rubbing some paint off one of theirs. It's sad and a waste of resources, but the camera industry is not the only one.
I don't care what gear I have.
Things I sell: http://www.shutterstock.com/sets/413...html?rid=611052 Member(s) liked this post
But if you were to read about the idea behind the use of that material on the watch. It's a pretty interesting concept. You use it, and it patinas over time. So what you end up with is a watch with a cool green patina.
Anyway, I do have several of the more classic Panerai watches. They're great and have a long and interesting history. All the markers of a great Indiana Jones film, but it's a watch company!
IMO this is the goofiest luxury edition of them all: collectors can put it in a case and never use it, so that it'll forever be a Minty distressed camera.
To be honest, I really LOVE the M60 but wish they had released it with the 50APO. I'd have bought it in a snap had they done that. I would have also liked to see it in black finish.
It's hard enough to hold one's head up in some photographic circles, where one is automatically considered a poseur and a fanboy simply for using a Leica. This does not help one bit. Even I'm embarrassed by it.
2 Member(s) liked this post
Since most of my Leica gear was stolen last year, I would happily take delivery of this "Correspondent" set ...
Bart ...1 Member(s) liked this post
So correspondents have always been carrying their Leica's in a snakeskin briefcase?
It would be cheaper to buy a brand new M-P body and selectively rub off parts of it with Brasso.
Advertising is always about the lie, addressing the point at which the product fails. The thing never makes you more attractive, desirable, thinner, etc...
Leica doesn't get that digital cameras are not like analog cameras, they will not last decades, they are obsolete consumer electronics from the day they are made. So they will never accumulate the kind of wear these cameras look like they have sustained- the sensor/battery will have long failed by then, or digital imaging will have moved on. 5-7 years is the lifetime of these products.
My M6 however will outlive me and making the assumption that film will still be around it will still be useful if one chooses that. Being the category that invented the idea, even if it does not it has nothing to prove.
It is like the forthcoming Apple Watch. The idea of selling a premium product in the digital sphere is nonsensical. Getting 3 years out of a iPhone is about it, to say that a the watch will remain useful considering battery failure, OS upgrades, the evolution of the internet, etc. means nothing we make now has any survivability. It is just not the DNA of the age we live in, to make long lasting products.
We are paying for simulacra.
I would not personally buy one if it was the same price as standard, but that's just me. Whatever makes people happy and makes Leica a profitable business works for me....
I like it so much I'm making own LOL
I'll never regard brassing the same again.
Or are we all just a bit shallow in our feelings for this camera?
Two thousand years ago until the present day Buddhism has the answer in the concept of wabi-sabi, 'nothing is perfect, nothing is finished, nothing lasts'.
Once accepted it's a concept that may stop burst blood vessels.
IMO it does look cool but the fact that it is artifical I would allways feel like owning a fake camera.
If this was as camera which my father and myself have used and it would look like this from real use, I would be very proud to own and use it.
On the other side, people by jeans in used look, bags and all kinds of stuff, why not a camera.
but the user experience of a leica, or the look of some sigma cameras might save them from the landfill.
Here is one for sale for 33,000 Euros:
Leica M6 with sandpaper (to be spent in the style Leica M-P "Correspondent") | eBay
However, I have to disagree with most on the topic of Leica making high end luxury goods. They are merely responding to the luxury goods market, which is growing at a staggering rate, and it very well might be what they need to do to survive. These "Kravitz" cameras will be sold, to multimillionaires or billionaires as Christmas or Birthday gifts. The extremely wealthy just don't care about the price tag, but if this keeps Leica in business and thriving, then so be it. It is more a reflection on the state of the world than the company itself.
I worked for Taschen books, and if it were not for the ridiculous 5/10/15 K books they sell to the .1% of the world's wealthiest, the company might not exist any more. I for one am very happy that it does, because it is an absolutely brilliant and unique publishing house. Same goes for Leica.