I do feel (see) that the IQ I get with the Leica S006 and S lenses is a step up from what I see from Canikon FF DSLRs and also from what I see from the Leica M 240 in regards of detail, color and tonality.
Now I wonder how much is from the sensor type, how much from the sensor size and how much from the lenses.
And I wonder how close a Leica SL with good primes (for example the 50/1.4 SL once it is available, or good R-glass or the M 50 APO-Summicron) would come close to the IQ I get with the Leica S.
At the moment I assume there will still be quite a difference, since the SL sensor is based on the Q and while the Q IQ is fine I dont find the color up to what I see from the S.
Any opinions? Or Jono, did you eventually shoot the S lenses on the SL, or even SL and S side by side?