So... Today I received in the mail a brochure / magazine from Hasselblad. In it there is a test comparing what seems to be (matching specs and lens used) a 1Ds MKIII with 50mm f1.2L and a H3DII31.
Here is a link to the online comparison: http://www.hasselblad.com/media/1664...rthebetter.pdf
So, my totally stupid and mundane questions is this: Is the difference really that dramatic? The 1dsIII shot looks terrible, really smeared detail and CA through the roof. The lens used is not exactly known to be a stellar performer, in technical terms at least, so I'm sure that has something to do with the poor showing, but really? I'm pretty sure I get better files out of my D700.
Stupid question end... :sleep006: