gogopix
Subscriber
Good point.Correct and the bottom line it really is a 30mm. Let's remember theses are the only 2 28mm's on the market outside of tech lenses. Not a easy lens to design so I give them both a lot of credit for what they can do outside there small issues. Rather have it than not and I use mine all the time. Probably would have never gone into MF to begin with not having them on the market.
Zeiss designed the 35mm for Contax and the 30mm fisheye for Hasselblad. That was for a 60mm film (6x6 645 etc) I can only believe they saw this as a reasonable limit for rectilinear MF lenses (and even the 35mm is about a 21mm equivalent). Other wise they had a separate system for really WA. (film had SOME advantages!
If you need more you can shift or stitch. Is less than 21mm really critical for most work (I do remmeber an excellent cockpit shot, 21mm C/Y wasn't it? by Guy)
Anyway, 28 pushes it down to 17mm ?
Maybe it is, as Guy says, just awfully tough to get down there with a reasonable size and price.
Victor