tashley
Subscriber Member
These things are very hard to do scientifically in a way that satisfies everyone so this is my sharing something I did primarily for myself: others are welcome to draw their own conclusions or to decide that the methodology isn't worth drawing conclusions from.
I shot all these at the same EV's (barring the difference between 1/40th and 1/45th for example) and this means that the Leica M9 shots are slightly underexposed, the Canon 5DII about right and the P65+ shots slightly overexposed. C1 defaults on every files give slight differences in NR and sharpening and this over-sharpens the Canon files.
The aim was to test my recent feeling that the P65+ sensor plus files weren't as good as I'd hoped/expected.
Here's the whole scene. I shot by hand rather than tripod so as to maintain the perspective without shuffling tripods and allowing light levels to drop. Glass was 80D on the Phase, 50 Lux on the M9 and 50 Cron with adaptor on the Canon, F2.8 on each.
I shot all these at the same EV's (barring the difference between 1/40th and 1/45th for example) and this means that the Leica M9 shots are slightly underexposed, the Canon 5DII about right and the P65+ shots slightly overexposed. C1 defaults on every files give slight differences in NR and sharpening and this over-sharpens the Canon files.
The aim was to test my recent feeling that the P65+ sensor plus files weren't as good as I'd hoped/expected.
Here's the whole scene. I shot by hand rather than tripod so as to maintain the perspective without shuffling tripods and allowing light levels to drop. Glass was 80D on the Phase, 50 Lux on the M9 and 50 Cron with adaptor on the Canon, F2.8 on each.
Last edited: