Victor:
I have to disagree with you on a couple points.
First, you have to consider that the Hy6 camera is a 6x6 camera. This doesn't make it cumbersome and large is a relative term. The Contax is a great camera, but it is a 645 camera, the Hy6 is a 6x6. It is natural for the Hy6 to be bigger than the Contax. If size is the prequisite, then perhaps 6x6 format is not the option someone should be looking at. Unless other considerations matter, such as:
*larger, brighter viewfinder (
I use MAxwell improves finder 2 stops)
*ergonomically adjustable grip (
subjective. The contax grip works just fine)
*the lack of a necessary "wake-up" tap before releasing the shutter (
no, you can just take the image, but it will take time for AE and AF, as will any sleeping camera)
*advanced features like "focus trap" and more to come (
dont need. actually use MF mostly)
*flash sync speeds up to 1/1000th of a second (again
, rather have the 1/4000)
*access to many of the same lenses the Contax uses and more (
the HB; yes, I agree)
*45 degree finder, in addition to the WLF and 90 degree (contax
finders are small and work well)
*readily available from the manufacturer in warrantied condition (
yes, of course)
*parts and service guaranteed to be readily available for years (
ditto)
If these other items matter, and size is not the only criteria, then I think anyone should consider the Hy6. Is it expensive? Well, that again is a relative term. It is more expensive than the Contax, but then most products that are still in production tend to be more expensive than products which are no longer in production since you're buying them new instead of used.
Regarding Hasselblad, again being expensive is a relative term, The only MF camera system that can be had for significantly less than the Hy6/H3D systems is the Contax, which is fine if you don't mind the disadvantages against the Hy6 posted above. Even the new Mamiya AFDIII is no longer a budget camera as the new digital lenses for this product cost as much (and more) than the lenses for the H3D.
Also, you stated Hasselblad software is "Flaky". Can you please go into more detail here? Generally the term "Flaky" is used to describe a product that is quirky or unstable, and the Hasselblad software, whether it is Flexcolor or even the new Phocus software is anything but. Flexcolor has been one of the most rock solid applications that any of my customers deal with. I know, because I monitor all of the tech support issues. And Flexcolor has been great.
The H3D is indeed a "closed" system, just like the Canon and Nikon and ...
All that "closed" means is that should you decide to change, you'll be selling a camera and some lenses in addition to the digital back. It's not like buying a closed system locks you into something where you suddenly have no choice. And you benefit from the advantages of the integration.
As much as I feel the Hy6 and H3D are great camera systems, remember that Leaf, Sinar and Hasselblad all make excellent digital backs for any MF camera - some, like Hasselblad and Sinar, with user changeable camera adapter kits. So, if you're looking for the most versatility possible, a Sinar or Hasselblad on any camera - or camera{s} - you want is an awesome and affordable solution.
BTW - below are some size comparison images between the cameras (unfortunately didn't have a digital back for the Contax/Mamiya available at the time of shooting).
Steve Hendrix
www.ppratlanta.com/digital.php