Well you still need to hook me. LOL
Maybe S3
:ROTFL: of course.
Still, I understand Woody - If I was considering going to MF (which I'm not). Then I'd want it almost exclusively for landscape, which would mean it would have to work in the rain / dust etc. It would have to be reasonably compact, and the lenses would need to be rain/dust protected as well.
I wouldn't want all the other bells and whistles particularly, so that, if I could afford it, the S2 would provide things that I DO want which aren't available elsewhere, without presenting many limitations.
Actually, I would also have been using it at the wedding I was doing over the weekend . . in the pouring rain!
On the other hand - from your point of view it's a very expensive way of getting a camera which is missing lots that you do want, without providing much extra, for a lot of money - not very enticing!
erm, what I'm trying to say is that for
some of us the S2 is a more attractive proposition than any of the other MF options.