yaya
Active member
Any suggestion for how this can be achieved in a digital back? Or are you talking about a new camera system?Also movable multi focus points similar to Nikon/Canon
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Any suggestion for how this can be achieved in a digital back? Or are you talking about a new camera system?Also movable multi focus points similar to Nikon/Canon
I guess it's related to subject. I found that the Dalsa sensor have some kind of I don't know what for people and some subjects. The reason for wanting a higher resolution for that kind of application is not counting the number of cells on the model face. Is to kill moiréYou sure about that? Your current 40 has a 4minute max exposure with great results.
I have never seen a Dalsa do more than 32 seconds and we are not even discussing how it looks like.
I am in the same boat and still wondering whether I want the H4D50MS or the H4D60. Pro's and con's for both.
Business has been excellent this year but who knows when that will end..
If that is the case and it ushers the era of new backs it will be very interesting to see what they add. I'm intrigued because C1 ver 6.0 announcement talks about the iPad app coming, presumably to be used in tandem with tethering but what will tethering be? Is wireless fast enough????? These sort of changes would open up using a MacBook Air etc. in the field.....fun times ahead.Everything is a guess, but
The back won't be called P80+ or P85+, it will be a new product with a new name.
The back will be out, or better shown before the end of the year. (probably will ship next year)
The whole back will be redesigned.
I'm not so sure about that statement Guy.P40 + does not have micro lenses
Oh I am so positive on this. Okay so drinks in Feb. on the line here. LOLI'm not so sure about that statement Guy.
Read the blurb in the banded image in this link:
http://www.phaseone.com/en/search/article.aspx?articleid=1221&languageid=1
You're both right. Dalsa calls them microlenses, but I wouldn't. They are very shallow and only modestly help increase the effective iso of the back.Oh I am so positive on this. Okay so drinks in Feb. on the line here. LOL
Ill buy regardless.:ROTFL::ROTFL::ROTFL::ROTFL:
Doug where ARE YOU. LOL
Ed, Rodenstock and Schneider tend to be very conservative about making absolute statements on their lens performance. When designing a lens absolute resolving power is usually not included in the design specs. I think among other lens properties they try to get very good contrast modulation in certain spatial frequencies across the lens's specified image circle. High resolving power is just something that comes with a design. But it's hard to measure because it depends a lot on the input contrast and the capture medium's threshold for image contrast.Here's my question: With the sharpest glass designed to support the dot pitch of the 60MP back, how much sharper will the 80MP be without NASA quality optics that are not commercially available?
RE from the Rodenstock website:
The lenses of the Rodenstock series HR Digaron-W have been optimized for large sensor formats with a pixel pitch of about 6 μm for highest resolution up to 60 megapixels
Well, one reason for not choosing Profoto could be that it is such a wide gamut space. It's wider than any device can output. The gaps between the tonal values are larger than in a more confined color space. This might not cause any problems working in 16 bit but smaller adjustments do have a larger effect than in other more optimized color spaces.I would agree that while 1998 is a perfectly fine color space that ProPhoto is worthwhile to look into if your source images are coming from a digital back where the potential color captured is in a very large (device) color gamut. Mind you that the raw remains in the device color space so you could always go back later and process to a wider gamut but I see very little reason not to process in Profoto to start with, or for a more archival-oriented workflow save your tiffs with the embeded profile before changing them downstream to whatever your needs are.
Marc,
I've done more than 30 seconds with a P40+ Here is a one minute exposure....skip the content but technically it didn't have a noise issue
View attachment 37982
Extraordinary!!!!P40 + does not have micro lenses and I have gone a full minute just around the corner where Terry shot with excellent results . Can it go longer not sure it was cold out and it probably could have went 2 minutes. Hard to say
This one was 30 seconds and I did go 60 seconds same shot and looks identical
I am guessing that it will be like the Hasselblad one. For what I have read Hasselblad's iPad application was a great impact at Photokina.If that is the case and it ushers the era of new backs it will be very interesting to see what they add. I'm intrigued because C1 ver 6.0 announcement talks about the iPad app coming, presumably to be used in tandem with tethering but what will tethering be? Is wireless fast enough????? These sort of changes would open up using a MacBook Air etc. in the field.....fun times ahead.
Pixel pitch does not equal pixel density. My understanding is that the pixel size of the 80 Mp sensor is the same as the 60, but they have increased the density by reducing the size of the gap between the pixels.Here's my question: With the sharpest glass designed to support the dot pitch of the 60MP back, how much sharper will the 80MP be without NASA quality optics that are not commercially available?
RE from the Rodenstock website:
The lenses of the Rodenstock series HR Digaron-W have been optimized for large sensor formats with a pixel pitch of about 6 μm for highest resolution up to 60 megapixels