T
thsinar
Guest
Thanks Guy!
Thierry
Thierry
Alright I guess you don't want to give it up, so i won't push it. LOL
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Alright I guess you don't want to give it up, so i won't push it. LOL
Indeed, what are you talking about Thierry?I thought it was Cosmos Scientific Systems Inc http://www.cosmos.jp/
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0604/06042501mamiyaselloff.asp
Indeed, what are you talking about Thierry?
Had to scream for a second. I Feel better now:ROTFL::ROTFL::ROTFL::ROTFL:
Ha!! I feel the same way Guy....except in my case, it's one of these.Don't know , Don't care I JUST ONE OF THESE. NOW !!!!!!!!!!
Actually, no you don't, and neither do most professionals. That's why there are choices. The CFV is a good one of those choices amonst many. Just get it and go make magic ...Ha!!
After all, amateurs like myself don't really need 50 megapixels, do we?
Gary Benson
Eagle River, Alaska
Actually I think the number of pixels you want or need is directly related to the print size you want. My 39Mpx back prints 22 x 30 at native (240 DPI) resolution. So I can go to the max width of my Epson 7800 with no uprezzing.Actually, no you don't, and neither do most professionals. That's why there are choices. The CFV is a good one of those choices amonst many. Just get it and go make magic ...