plainwhiteshirt
Member
one more question...
have never worked with the hc 50-110 lens since i do own primes.
now it comes that i need 60-70mm for documentary/portraits (the 50mm is too wide/disorts too much).
my question is: is it worth to go for the 50-110?
i've heared that it's quite bulky + it's weight causes problems sometimes when you 'store it the wrong way'. in addition to that the AF seems to be quite slow... on the other hand it has f3.5 up to 70mm which supersedes the hc 50?!?
how about all that facts?
since i need every single f-stop i dont want to go for the 35-90 which seems to be modern, quicker and lighter.
any suggestions/recommendations?
have never worked with the hc 50-110 lens since i do own primes.
now it comes that i need 60-70mm for documentary/portraits (the 50mm is too wide/disorts too much).
my question is: is it worth to go for the 50-110?
i've heared that it's quite bulky + it's weight causes problems sometimes when you 'store it the wrong way'. in addition to that the AF seems to be quite slow... on the other hand it has f3.5 up to 70mm which supersedes the hc 50?!?
how about all that facts?
since i need every single f-stop i dont want to go for the 35-90 which seems to be modern, quicker and lighter.
any suggestions/recommendations?