The specular highlights on my Valeo 22 seem to blow out in a quite unappealing fashion that I never noticed on my DSLR. Is this to be expected? It's like shooting slide film, only worse.
I realize that digital in general doesn't provide the highlight latitude that print film does, but I didn't expect an MFDB to be more intolerant than a DSLR. It would seem the only answer would be to ETTL.
Or, the other possibility is that Leaf software handles the .mos files in a significantly better manner than LR3?
I am hesitant to use the MFDB outdoors, because unless I ensure I underexpose to retain the sky, I'll likely get ugly banding.
Thoughts? Known equipment limitation, or operator error?
I realize that digital in general doesn't provide the highlight latitude that print film does, but I didn't expect an MFDB to be more intolerant than a DSLR. It would seem the only answer would be to ETTL.
Or, the other possibility is that Leaf software handles the .mos files in a significantly better manner than LR3?
I am hesitant to use the MFDB outdoors, because unless I ensure I underexpose to retain the sky, I'll likely get ugly banding.
Thoughts? Known equipment limitation, or operator error?