To be more precise, I was looking at the Leaf Aptus-II 5 with 9 microns pixel size. What are the advantages of this compared to larger MP backs with smaller pixel size.
Is there anything immediately apparent with this size, and aside from costs and not necessarily needing more MPs, is it recommended?
I know Dan L., shoots with one here and among others, and love what I see.
Anything to share with me would be welcomed and appreciated.
If I do take on this route, it may be the end of the year and used on my RZ Pro II (non-D). It will be the easiest step for into MF since I have one and three lenses (50, 110, 180).
Thanks
Po
Is there anything immediately apparent with this size, and aside from costs and not necessarily needing more MPs, is it recommended?
I know Dan L., shoots with one here and among others, and love what I see.
Anything to share with me would be welcomed and appreciated.
If I do take on this route, it may be the end of the year and used on my RZ Pro II (non-D). It will be the easiest step for into MF since I have one and three lenses (50, 110, 180).
Thanks
Po