Aesthetically..... very true!
However, when discussing the Arca R cameras I consider them to be a masterpiece of engineering and unrivalled in that respect.
Yes, Arca cameras are engineered very well, but aesthetically I find the "R" series not appealing and when I gave the "R" a serious look at, I realized I would be paying for things I would not need. When you buy into the "R" series, you buy the entire package. You have more customization options with ALPA.
For example, I do not want or need all the numbers written on my lenses (i.e., ALPA HFA Rings, Arca lens mount) as I know where the focus spots are on my lenses from testing, so I prefer a very simple camera design. I know a lot of photographers want to use Distos and use the numbers for absolute precision; me, I prefer using a minimum amount of lenses and will stick to those lenses for years and know where the sweet spots are.
I think for me at least the big difference I see between these two cameras is the Arca "R" is all beefed up for the photographer that likes all the techie stuff and with ALPA if you want all the techie stuff you have the option to add it or not. I have always preferred the simplest design in my equipment.
It has always been about content for me and not playing with gear--but, I understand and APPRECIATE the photographers that do love the gear and give it a workout. I read their reviews and study their work and this is how I get the best education on gear.
I would be lost without this forum and all the contributors that have something worthwhile to say: technically and photographically! :clap: