dougpeterson
Workshop Member
Following a week of interviewing sources here, as promised, is my article on the back story of the development of the new Phase One IQ260.
IQ260 Story
IQ260 Story
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Thanks!Doug, interesting read, and I wanted to compliment you on the images used to illustrate. While not necessarily content rich, as illustrations I was struck by how these backs render the subtleties of light ... which is also an attribute of MFD that often goes unheralded.
We will be doing such tests this week.I would rather expect a deeper pixel well to adversely affect Lens Cast issues. Wouldn't less photons at extreme angles hit the bottom of the well? I reckon I'll find out.
Doug, have you guys done any test with shifts on an SK 35 or 43?
CB
Doug, I think its great we finally have a long exposure back in the IQ form but while this is the big news of the IQ2 I'd also like to know and see some examples of any improvements over the P65+/IQ160 chip when doing good old regular exposures.I'm really looking forward to seeing the thread here filling up with images from some of the extraordinarily talented individuals here who are chomping at the bits to get an IQ with long exposure.
Our tests forthcoming.Doug, I think its great we finally have a long exposure back in the IQ form but while this is the big news of the IQ2 I'd also like to know and see some examples of any improvements over the P65+/IQ160 chip when doing good old regular exposures.
I know there was supposedly a 0.5 stop increase in DR but what about overall IQ - is it just the same as we have already?