The H series is an odd duck in my eyes. The cameras don't have focal plane shutters, I tried Phocus a long while ago to process some H files and removed it the same day, battery life is pretty short, camera body looks like a Honda Element, ISO performance not at the same level as other MF cams, and the lens lineup doesn't seem as impressive as the others.
I currently have had both Phase One and Hasselblad H systems (and still have). I have different opinion from you regarding the lenses.
Hasselblad H, in my opinion, has a more complete lens system and better thought system than Phase One. It has had 23, 28, 35, 50, 80, 100, 120 (Macro), 150, 210, 300, 1.7 teleconverter, 1.5 HTS, 35-90mm and 55-100. The new series II are even better. They don't have fisheye or 500mm but no other systems have. The quality of most lenses are excellent at least with my amateur eyes.
Phase One lens system are more immature (if you don't count non-digital lenses) although the SK and some Phase One/Mamiya digital lenses especially 150mm are spectacular.
The DF body is clearly not as good as the H4D. If there is no new body in the next 2 years, I will switch completely to Hasselblad or Leica S.
Thanks,
Pramote