I agree with Don, I normally read this forum on my laptop, and I cannot see everything on my screen. About 800-900 is the limit for me on the long side. The portrait of the boy seems to be 900x1200.
Quick reply before I go to bed, since you asked for some feedback in another thread:
The lens shots look slightly too strongly lit, in my opinion. The highlights are killing the detail underneath them. Other than that, they are technically well done, but also not different from regular product shots.
The watches looks much better, but again, they are technically well done, but not so interesting. These shots all need "an idea" to bring them to life. The blue background works, I think, but doesn't happen to be my taste.
The metal grating looks like the sort of test shot you do when you want to get minimum depth of field at near focus distance with a new lens
I like your portraits of your kids (I presume? I recognize your daughter, I am pretty sure). They look comfortable with you taking their photo. The boy looks slightly posed, but it is a nice pose. It bothers me a little that his near eye is blurred, and I would have used slightly more depth of field to get them both sharp. The portrait of the girl looks very nice, fun, like an outtake in a photo session. I think I would crop it a little higher to get rid of the bagginess of the dress. I think she is sitting, and her knees are holding the dress out, and it looks bigger because of this, which looks a little odd.
All of the shots are of a high technical standard I think, but as you hinted in the other thread, other than the portrait of your daughter, they lack a special touch, something unique. If you keep doing it, at some point I think something will come. After years of shooting, suddenly it came to me as I was repeating something I had often done.