The GetDPI Photography Forum

Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!

Fun with MF images - ARCHIVED - FOR VIEWING ONLY

Status
Not open for further replies.

tsjanik

Well-known member
Hi Tim,

I've got this lens and the 1.4x but have yet to use the combo much. Are these all taken with the tripod and full support system we have discussed before, or can you get away with faster shutter speed shots using less support?
Ed, I always use the tripod with this lens. I can get away without the extra support system if using high shutter speeds >1/250s. Even with the extra support, speeds around 1/15s, are problematic; the addition of the Manfrotto is then very helpful.

Tom
 

chaosphere

Member
The series is very nice and the post processing fits very well. Is this the same grain that Olivier Chauvignat uses?
Hello Jerome and thank you :) , I don't know what Olivier uses, but I think it's quite a more complex method he does. I don't "need" that complexity to fake grain. It's only LR processed and I'm happy with the results.

Here is another, one of my favourite portrait. Gaucho from Urdinarrain, Entre Rios, Argentina.

 

Grayhand

Well-known member
For some strange reason was it I who liked this better than the customer.
I always work from the principle that I, the artist, is always right, and the customer, very seldom ;)

Ray

RZ, P45, could be 140 macro..

 

Ed Hurst

Well-known member
Dave and Tom - thanks for your advice on the support system. I have all the parts for a very good support solution but haven't yet played with it much!
 

jerome_m

Member
Hello Jerome and thank you :) , I don't know what Olivier uses, but I think it's quite a more complex method he does.
I can't check what Olivier wrote about it because the forum where he posted details it is not accessible from Germany any more, but I recall that he used a different grain for the dark and for the lights parts of the image.

When did you take this pictures? I thought you sold your H3D-39.
 

chaosphere

Member
Really ? Why is this about CI not visible from Germany ??
I took this picture on my trip in January this year. I sold two years ago my H3D-39 for the H3DII-39.
 

gurtch

Well-known member
Several more from my Father's lost for 72 years negatives. I found the negative that was used on the August 1937 cover of Zeiss Magazine. It is posted along with a scan of the magazine cover.
Thanks for looking
Dave in NJ
 

jerome_m

Member
Really ? Why is this about CI not visible from Germany ??
I don't know. CI does not answer my mails. I have access when on holidays in France. In Munich, none of my friends have access. All we get is an Apache test page.

Tell the people on the forum I say hello, but I don't think I will come back.

I took this picture on my trip in January this year.
Must have been an interesting trip.

I sold two years ago my H3D-39 for the H3DII-39.
You just changed the H3D-39 for the H3DII-39? I think that the only difference is that you get is a bigger screen?
 

chaosphere

Member
I don't know. CI does not answer my mails. I have access when on holidays in France. In Munich, none of my friends have access. All we get is an Apache test page.

Tell the people on the forum I say hello, but I don't think I will come back.



Must have been an interesting trip.



You just changed the H3D-39 for the H3DII-39? I think that the only difference is that you get is a bigger screen?
That's it but the screen was so... awful... ! And I got the H3DII-39 a lot cheaper than the H3D-39 with 6 month warranty !

I love this camera. The only better for me would be a bigger sensor.
 

jerome_m

Member
I found the negative that was used on the August 1937 cover of Zeiss Magazine. It is posted along with a scan of the magazine cover.
It is the same boat, but is not quite the same picture. There are some changes in the sand, for example the three clumps on the left of the rope become two. The round bit at the rear of the boat is not there.
 

jerome_m

Member
That's it but the screen was so... awful... ! And I got the H3DII-39 a lot cheaper than the H3D-39 with 6 month warranty !

I love this camera. The only better for me would be a bigger sensor.
You are probably thinking about the 60 mpix sensor, but it is not much bigger actually.

I should say that I am quite pleased by the H cameras myself. I like the lenses.
 

gurtch

Well-known member
It is the same boat, but is not quite the same picture. There are some changes in the sand, for example the three clumps on the left of the rope become two. The round bit at the rear of the boat is not there.
Thanks for pointing that out...very strange. I have only found one negative so far. If there are two negs, they must have been taken close to the same time, as the sky is the same (the burning & dodging original darkroom vs my digital approximation not withstanding). The round bit missing is strange. Had it been missing in my print, one could say I eliminated it digitally (I didn't).
Best regards
Dave
 

Nathan W. Lediard

New member
A shot from a job I did late last year... Job was delivered in colour, but I liked it in B&W..

Andrine Flemmen, Ex top Alpine Skier and really nice person to work with!

H4D-40 HC150n and a bucket load of profoto lighting... :D

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top