mkphotomedia
Member
I just tried out the "new" SK Digitar 60XL on my Cambo WDS+P45 at Capture Integration's workshop this past week, and it's a pretty phenomenal lens as far as maintaining detail out into the corners, not having a lot of falloff, and not needing much LCC. Only problem is: it's expensive, and I'm thinking it also might be a wee bit long for what I'd want to be using it for. I'm doing primarily interior/exterior architecture, and I'm finding that I sometimes need a longer lens for architectural details and for shooting buildings from across streets. In the 35mm world, this would be where the Canon 45TS-E would be the "run-to" option.
1. Does anyone know what the differences *in practice* between the "old" and "new" SK 60 actually are?
2. There seem to be four 'on the wide side of normal' Cambo-mount lenses that could possibly get the job done: the "new" SK60, the "old" SK60, and the Rodenstock 55 and 50. The Digaron-S 60 is right out due to the skimpy 70mm image circle. Anyone have any thoughts on the 50 or 55?
1. Does anyone know what the differences *in practice* between the "old" and "new" SK 60 actually are?
2. There seem to be four 'on the wide side of normal' Cambo-mount lenses that could possibly get the job done: the "new" SK60, the "old" SK60, and the Rodenstock 55 and 50. The Digaron-S 60 is right out due to the skimpy 70mm image circle. Anyone have any thoughts on the 50 or 55?