freaklikeme
Member
Hi, all, and thanks for clicking in.
I recently picked up a 645D and have been using it with Hassy lenses, primarily a CF 40 FLE and CF 100/3.5, both of which I love. Now I'd like to get something longer for portraits. I really like what I've seen from both the CF 150/4 and F 150/2.8 and I think that would be the right focal length for me.
But now I can't decide between the two. I've compared the info in Zeiss' documentation and looked at sample photos and it seems like the CF is a better all-arounder where the comparatively flawed performance of the F works out better for portraiture. Or it's entirely possible that I'm seeing things I want to see because the F is a little bit lighter, faster, and comes with no chance of the central shutter tripping while I'm trying to get a time-sensitive shot.
So I'm seeking opinions. Any advice from users of one or both will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Brad
I recently picked up a 645D and have been using it with Hassy lenses, primarily a CF 40 FLE and CF 100/3.5, both of which I love. Now I'd like to get something longer for portraits. I really like what I've seen from both the CF 150/4 and F 150/2.8 and I think that would be the right focal length for me.
But now I can't decide between the two. I've compared the info in Zeiss' documentation and looked at sample photos and it seems like the CF is a better all-arounder where the comparatively flawed performance of the F works out better for portraiture. Or it's entirely possible that I'm seeing things I want to see because the F is a little bit lighter, faster, and comes with no chance of the central shutter tripping while I'm trying to get a time-sensitive shot.
So I'm seeking opinions. Any advice from users of one or both will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Brad