I know I'm still very new to digital MF (5 days of nearly constant reading) but just as I thought I was getting somewhere......
So can someone explain, is a larger sensor always going to be better, than a smaller one, even if they are the same number of pixels?
For instance I'm looking at a Hassy H5d 50c with a sensor size of 32.9 x 43.8 only to see that the older H4d & H3d some with lower pixel backs (22mp, 39mp) all have a larger sensor at 49.1 x 36.8.
So the latest H5d has a sensor only 1.7 times bigger than my FF Nikon.
Presumably all the reading I've done about MF sensor being so much better than 35mm as its 2.5 times bigger is referring to the very high MP backs only?