I recently got a Mamiya AFDII with a Sinar 54m 22mp back. My pictures and files seemed nice, smooth, sharp with good depth. The problem with the Sinar back is it only works tethered so I bought a Leaf Aptus II-8 40mp, from Ben off this site so I could carry around my camera easier on photowalks with my wife (As opposed to my easy to use Leica). I'm just an amateur but I do submit some pictures to a couple of stock companies for the challenge. I have noticed that even on a tripod its harder for me to get the nice sharp pleasing pictures with my Leaf like I could with my Sinar. I was wondering if this could be because of the higher pixel count seeing more resolution? Or what? Not all my pictures with the Leaf are bad just a higher percentage than with the Sinar.