Howdy from down under… Some Melbournians here… would love to catch up sometime.
Not sure if the back really merits a thread of its own; personally, I think it is more of an evolution than a revolution.
My first thoughts were: how would it compare, ie. IQ3100 vs IQ280 / 380? - my primary interest being tech cameras.
Over the last few hours, I’ve been playing with the tech cam files so kindly provided by Doug et al. Man, gotta praise you guys over the level of customer engagement you’ve created here. Folks down under could learn a thing or two….just saying.
I was pleasantly surprised that the files from IQ3 100 quite closely match with the IQ280, albeit with minor adjustments. One might ask, why bother. Well, I thought since I have been a long term fan of the CCD sensors (tonality, render, microcontrast, 3d-look-whatever-that-is) this might be a good opportunity to actually do some real world comparison.. (before making the move :too cool: ). Fact is that I recently sold my IQ280 last year to fund other things and have been groaning in pain ever since. Now that I happen to be in a position to move in again, just thought how the backs would compare.. it happens that at base iso, they are quite comparable actually.
Any real world experiences with the new 100MP here?
Some test shots at high ISOs. All at iso 6400 .. Oh my !!!!