I really don't get this continued desire to bash Hasselblad.I think that the point of the shallow depth of field and the MF look are more important for many people than the maybe slightly better Color to noise ratio of the bigger pixels
(which are actually not so big at all, 5,4 to 4,65 Micron - or in percent a 24x36 Sony A7RII chip pixel has around 77% of the 50 Mpix MF chip - and that one is not Backside illuminated.... ).
and losing the ability to use any kind of lens because of the lacking FPS is even more severe. On a scale of max usability that weighs much higher than a subpar AF.I would have completely left this off, by this Blad could have also made the lenses much smaller , lighter, cheaper and nevertheless more lightcollecting, with maybe f2.0 or even better.
There could have been a growing market of third party accessories, lenses, adapters and much more - all these things that make a camera system fun to use.
Nothing of all this will happen.
Sad.
I just went and looked at your site and looked at your cameras, they are not for me but I'm not going to hunt down a forum post and rant about missing features, 4K video, image stabilisation, microwave, lasers (because lasers are cool). Why do you feel the need to attack some one else product?