No, you were explicitly talking about the amount of background blur, caused by depth of field, not bokeh. You even said you couldn't comment on beautiful look or ugly look. Bokeh is the quality of the blur, not the amount. A Leica- SL 24-90 zoom for instance is much smoother than almost all the cheaper primes from Canon in that focal length, although DOF is larger in most cases, and to most people that would constitute good bokeh. What you seem to be looking for is maximum blur, ie an almost solid background with as few features as possible irrespective of how the lens renders the subject. The downside to that approach is that although you generally get pleasing images, you often lose all context in your image, which is very important to most wedding photographers and for family shooters as well.