I was wondering if anyone could advise me on the Arca Swiss Universalis system.
I've been shooting 4x5, Sinar F2 and Chamonix 45n2, for a couple of years (mostly architecture). I also use a Canon 6D and a TS-e24 for commissioned work.
The process of image making between these tools is obviously very different and so I've been thinking of switching to one tool that will be able to handle film and MF digital, which brings me to the Universalis.
As I understand it, I can buy the 6x9 Universalis and use my set of 4x5 lenses right away. Later, I could upgrade to a MFDB and add a digital lens or two. I could also add the 4x5 standard/ bellows and ditch my old Sinar.
Does this sound correct?
As I understand it, the Universalis has front rise, orbix tilt and non-geared swing. The rear has rise/fall and shift. Is this correct?
Aside from more movements, does the MF2 have any other advantages? It does seem much heavier so it may not be suited for field work.
Thanks!
I've been shooting 4x5, Sinar F2 and Chamonix 45n2, for a couple of years (mostly architecture). I also use a Canon 6D and a TS-e24 for commissioned work.
The process of image making between these tools is obviously very different and so I've been thinking of switching to one tool that will be able to handle film and MF digital, which brings me to the Universalis.
As I understand it, I can buy the 6x9 Universalis and use my set of 4x5 lenses right away. Later, I could upgrade to a MFDB and add a digital lens or two. I could also add the 4x5 standard/ bellows and ditch my old Sinar.
Does this sound correct?
As I understand it, the Universalis has front rise, orbix tilt and non-geared swing. The rear has rise/fall and shift. Is this correct?
Aside from more movements, does the MF2 have any other advantages? It does seem much heavier so it may not be suited for field work.
Thanks!