Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Thanks David for reminding me on your rental business. Was trying to separate this out to some degree but bottom line any rental house that wants to buy the S2 and use that for rentals can do that. They would buy from the Leica sales reps usually in that case.Actually, just to clarify, we do rent gear like Nikon, Canon, Avenger, Elincrhom, Profoto, etc. We also have Leica test drive gear.
We don't have as much rental inventory as a large studio in NYC or even here in Miami, but we do a pretty steady rental business to local pros and amateurs.
I do plan on renting the S2 and S-system lenses. We are in a major fashion and advertising market, so if the three or four major rental studios don't carry it (which I'm sure they will), then we will fill the gap. So, Forrest, if you were shooting here in Miami, I'd have you covered. In fact, I'd drive to your shoot to hand deliver you a replacement myself within an hour.
In any of the major photo markets there should be solid representation and support from larger dealers and rental studios alike. Most rental houses don't offer support and actually buy their gear from dealers, not direct. When a Phase back breaks, they call up their dealer. I expect the same situation with the S2.
David
No nothing outside the normal LCD and i will start a new post of the rest here so I can transfer that to the LUF as well. I am having major MBP battery issue and lost 4 posts already and waiting for the Apple store to open to replace the battery. It's almost 2 years old and pretty well shotSo, Guy, in your handling of the S2, you talk a bit about its focus and shutter lag. What about over all responsiveness? Were you able to shoot things and look at them on something other than the LCD? Was anything other than ISO 100 available yet? What did that look like?
Did Leica talk about how their (Metz) flash will work with the S2? How accurate is the TTL part, or is it TTL-like?
On the lenses, what are their estimates of CS v. CS without the shutter availabilities? Did they have anything other than the earlier prototypes available to test out? The size and handling descriptions sound nice, but it is the optics and how that looks that most of us are more curious about.
Sorry to pepper with all the questions. Your impressions and recollections of some of this stuff does play into the vicarious experience for some ;-)
LJ
I think you just made my point. Hasselblad doesn't care that they screwed over H1/H2 users, because they only bought cameras from Hasselblad, not backs. I am sorry, but a camera is also a product. They should have thought this out ahead of time.Who cares if H1/2 Phase One users are pissed? Not me. Not Hasselblad I'll bet ... because they did nothing for Hasselbald's survival or prosperity.
Sure, but such is the human condition. Fool me once, shame on me, fool me twice, can't get fooled again Or even better, once burned, twice shy. I am sure there are a number of people in the Mamiya or Phase camps who would never return to Hasselblad because their trust was reamed once over by Hasselblad.I'm sorry, but it's a ludicrous argument wracked with emotional vagueness.
Here I have to plead ignorance. Whenever I have looked for CF/CFII prices, they have been very high. Where should I look to get a better idea? Let's say I am in the market for a 39MP back. Where can I fairly compare Phase One P45+, H3DII-39 and CFII-39 prices?I also wonder at the reference to over-priced CF backs since they have always been the same price or less than any comparable Phase One unit, and can be used on any camera you wish without the unit going bye-bye or paying a mount change fee. Now, it's for sure that the CF-II is less expensive.
I am aware of that. Leica is positioning themselves on the threshold between the two camps, and by not selling backs and bodies separately (which is sure to save a lot of development cost; maybe even enough to cover the difference in cost between a back and an S-system body upgrade...), they default to the closed camp. Whatever. I have no problem with someone being open or closed. It is just the going from open to closed case which stings.RE: the S2 redefining "closed" ... Canon and Nikon are not Medium Format systems ... just in case you didn't realize that ... it's an apples to watermelons analogy
Thanks, Guy. Looking forward to your other comments and stuff.No nothing outside the normal LCD and i will start a new post of the rest here so I can transfer that to the LUF as well. I am having major MBP battery issue and lost 4 posts already and waiting for the Apple store to open to replace the battery. It's almost 2 years old and pretty well shot
With all those lights in Vegas, there isn't a place to plug into ACI am having major MBP battery issue and lost 4 posts already and waiting for the Apple store to open to replace the battery. It's almost 2 years old and pretty well shot
But maybe we should be asking why we treat MF differently than 35mm DSLRs. I think this is what Leica started asking.RE: the S2 redefining "closed" ... Canon and Nikon are not Medium Format systems ... just in case you didn't realize that ... it's an apples to watermelons analogy
Exactly the issue LJ. Not real happy but I am about 300 yards from a new battery in a 1/2 hour Sometimes you just don't screw around and just get a new one. Love to update the laptop itself but not right nowThanks, Guy. Looking forward to your other comments and stuff.
Sorry to hear about your MBP battery issues. Rest assured, you are not alone there. I too am on my way to replace the battery for mine. Charge meter says 100%, pull the plug and instant shutdown in 10 minutes or less. Not good. There is a whole ugly community of threads about this on the Apple Discussion Forum.....nasty issue. Whatever battery you buy, it will NOT last very long, regardless of how careful you are with cycling it (weekly in some cases), and other tricks many of us have learned from camera gear. The batteries for these older MBPs just suck :thumbdown:
LJ
Hi my friend, will this be your motto when the S2 becomes available for purchase, hopefully this summer?Sometimes you just don't screw around and just get a new one.
This one is like a tennis match. And the ball will bounce back and forth all day long until the skin falls off. I see both sides of this match all too clearly and both sides have great serves as they say. I tend to look at this in a way that I am buying a bigger D3X and it is what it is and no way to take it apart and do something different with it. The separate back has two advantages that we can't take away from it either. It is a integrated system and a detachable one as well . Plus the the fact you can take for example all 4 phase backs and use it on one body for different types of shooting. The P30 plus is the fashion back as well as the P21 plus. The P65 is the landscape back with great amount of detail. The P45plus can go up to a hour with exposure and so on, so this is a very powerful setup in it's own right. Not to mention I can take my P25 Plus ( had to put this in somewhere. LOL) and put it on any tech camera i have and they fall into view camera and shifting camera's. The S2 or Nikon/Canon DSLR style cannot do this . Let's also remember the S2 is the overgrown DSLR style which is great. And certainly from what I saw a great speed advantage over what i shoot today. BTW just using the Phase as a example same applies to Leaf/Sinar and Hassy backs as well. Just easier for me to talk Phase because I know all the backs, anyway all this is important to you as the shooter and comes right down to the bottom line . It is what you shoot that will determine this , plain and simple and no getting around it either way. The S2 has it's place but can't do this or that and vise versa on the MF backs.But maybe we should be asking why we treat MF differently than 35mm DSLRs. I think this is what Leica started asking.
The idea of a digital back came about because there was a large installed base of MF shooters with extensive (and expensive) Hassy V, Mamiya 645, Contax 645, etc. systems. The very first backs were scanning backs like Better Light, then tethered only backs with no LCD like the Phase H series. Progress in this realm has been historically slow versus the relatively quick rise of the DSLR. Even an early DSLR like the Kodak DCS 620 (c. 1996) had internal processing, instant capture, on-board storage, and an LCD. Sure, it was a 6MP 1.5x crop camera that cost $30K at the time, but the technology that supported the sensor was more cutting edge than scanning backs that could only shoot still life with constant light sources. Players like Imacon, Phase One, Leaf, and Jenoptik did start to step it up and offer more of the DSLR-like convenience over time. How long did it take Imacon to offer CF storage instead of the Image Bank HD? Or why are we only getting half-usable LCD screens only in the last year? Why do some of the latest backs show hourglasses instead of images when you zoom in? Excuses are made all the time for lack of features or speed on these systems that cost in excess of $30K.
Without a doubt, MF backs have always offered a quality advantage over DX and FX DSLRs with larger sensors. But this came with a sacrifice in speed, simplicity, convenience, and ISO range. Why does it have to? The Hassy H3D tries to address this, but only gets some of the way there.
Ok so here's my question:
Do we need separate backs if one integrated system can do what we need it to do? Yes, I get the tech camera argument. Maybe we have a disproportionate amount of tech camera shooters here on this forum, but look at the professional market as a whole. 95%+ of pro shooters these days will never touch a tech camera. To say that the S2 is "non-starter" because it can't be mounted on a tech camera for 5% of the market is a bit odd to me. Does having a removable back protect your investment? The camera is the least expensive part of any of these systems today. And, the back is what becomes obsolete and depreciates the most. With a removable digital back, weather sealing is an impossibility. So many here complained that the M8 wasn't weather sealed, as this was a "pro requirement." So, Leica makes the first sealed MF camera and everyone complains that you can't remove the back, without wondering why this was never a "requirement" for MF. The S2 image processing/review is as fast as a 1DsIII or D3x. Why aren't other MF systems of the same resolution as fast? Why should the UI be so clunky on some of these systems, like not being able to set a preset WB in K before you shoot? Or easily set custom camera functions?
By making a closed system, or shall we say an fully integrated system, Leica is able to offer real advantages to what exists in the marketplace. They can make a camera that is smaller, faster, and (wait for it) higher quality than what exists today. As an optics company they will continually push the bounds of what is possible or "normal" in MF lenses. There aren't any of these excuses that are thrown around so casually like "Who cares if it sucks wide-open, or even stopped down two stops. It's MF, so you're going to shoot at f/11 anyway," or "Who cares if it has ghastly distortion through the viewfinder. The software will fix most of that." At the demo yesterday morning, Stephan had to repeat a few times that any program that can read DNG can convert the RAW files because Leica corrects the image in the lens, not in dedicated software. As it should be! And with a closed system, you don't have interface or communication issues as I've personally witnessed at demo road shows on more than one occasion. No separate camera and back f/w updates and compatibility issues. And, the camera is just simple to use. You turn it on and less than a third of a second later you shoot. That's it. Why is simple bad?
Sorry for the long oration here, but I just don't get it. If something is better, it just is. Maybe it's time to move forward from the digital back paradigm.
David
Thank you David - I excellent post . . . .Sorry for the long oration here, but I just don't get it. If something is better, it just is. Maybe it's time to move forward from the digital back paradigm.
David