An interesting, but unfair question, Erik ... until we dig a little deeper.
In my day job, I deal with the mathematics and probabilities of scenarios such as the one that you have proposed.
----------
The making of certain assumptions is required to answer your question.
The Most Probable assumption in the absence of any information (the usual situation until a little digging is done - we nearly always have Prior Information with an accuracy that will perceptively impact the predicted outcome) is that Hasselblad will sell the same number of each of the cameras, and that the profit margin is a fixed percentage of the retail price, and that they have the same number of forward sales.
In this mathematical Most Probable world, then the A5D-50c is your preferred product.
----------
However, I am certain that you (or others) have Prior Information about ...
1) the sales forecast (# of sales in a given time frame),
2) the sales that are already on the books from forward orders, and
3) the profilt margin for Hasselblad for each sale.
This Prior Information needs to be revealed, or else the result will be inconsistent with this "knowledge". The Prior Information in this instance is the answers to my questions, and an estimate of the accuracy of your answers.
----------
So back to you (and others) to reveal your individual answers (values and accuracy for 1 to 3 above).
I'm sure that more complex models of the supply of sensors, the choices that Hasselblad can make, and the vagaries of us, the customers. However, thay may not be any more useful due to the absence of hard facts.
And in closing, should the CFV-50c be added into the options? There may be some "hard" facts for this product that have been gleaned from annual replies, mandatory reporting be a company in Sweden, etc. I imagine that it could be a bit of a "sleeper" when I look at the various use-cases for the X1D. There could well be a large number of "amateurs" moving up from the the V-series (500 cameras) to the X-series.
----------
... MomentsForZen (Richard)