dchew
Well-known member
The recent discussion direction of tjv's ETTR thread made me wonder how others are processing IQ3 100 files. First, some context: I am somewhere between a beginner and intermediate user of C1. I still export processed files to LR for cataloging and in some cases further adjustments there or in PS.
I've been disappointed with C1's default rendering of images using the "film standard" curve. In general, I feel the curve is too strong (at least for landscapes), with shadows and some colors feeling “scrunched.” Without going through the time and effort to investigate Torger's dcamprof, I instead have changed the default import to "Linear Response." In general, when starting with Film Standard I have to use highlight and shadow recovery on almost every shot, while in Linear I usually add contrast. I can get close to the same result either way, but there remains something too harsh in darker colors using the film curve; not sure I can explain that. Perhaps for me it is simply easier to add contrast and clarity vs. trying to reduce it.
As an aside, using Linear has caused me to expose brighter, so from a SNR perspective maybe that is better anyway.
All this is subjective so I am curious what others are doing. Are most happy with the film standard curve? Is everyone making their own profiles? Does anyone else use Linear?
Probably time for me to reach out to Torger…
Dave
Note: I realize this is an image processing question but since it is specific to the back I thought better to post here. If it should be moved let me know.
I've been disappointed with C1's default rendering of images using the "film standard" curve. In general, I feel the curve is too strong (at least for landscapes), with shadows and some colors feeling “scrunched.” Without going through the time and effort to investigate Torger's dcamprof, I instead have changed the default import to "Linear Response." In general, when starting with Film Standard I have to use highlight and shadow recovery on almost every shot, while in Linear I usually add contrast. I can get close to the same result either way, but there remains something too harsh in darker colors using the film curve; not sure I can explain that. Perhaps for me it is simply easier to add contrast and clarity vs. trying to reduce it.
As an aside, using Linear has caused me to expose brighter, so from a SNR perspective maybe that is better anyway.
All this is subjective so I am curious what others are doing. Are most happy with the film standard curve? Is everyone making their own profiles? Does anyone else use Linear?
Probably time for me to reach out to Torger…
Dave
Note: I realize this is an image processing question but since it is specific to the back I thought better to post here. If it should be moved let me know.