Looking for a 95mm UV-filter with 100mm outer diameter for my HCD35-90

[Udo]

All the best for 2017!

I am looking for a 95mm circular UV or clear filter with 100mm outer diameter in order to utilise a LEE 100mm push-on filter holder on my HCD35-90 lens. Most of those filters (e.g. B+W) are 97 to 98mm. Does anyone have any suggestion? Thanks very much.

Regards, Udo

 

[JeRuFo]

Good quality 95mm filters are expensive. If you'd rather not have glass in there it is probably just as cheap to approach a local machine shop and have them make you exactly what you want, especially if you have to import a filter otherwise.

 

[jecxz]

Good quality 95mm filters are expensive. If you'd rather not have glass in there it is probably just as cheap to approach a local machine shop and have them make you exactly what you want, especially if you have to import a filter otherwise.

If you invest in a high quality lens you don't go cheap on the filter. Hasselblad sells a 95mm screw on polarizer that can accept the Lee push on.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/co...ap=y&m=Y&c3api=1876,91438732682,&Q=&A=details

Email me if you have questions.

Kind regards,
Derek

 

[danord]

Hello!
In my experience you don't need a special 100mm outer-diameter filter. I use regular (not slim) 95mm UV-filters on my 95mm H-lenses (35-90 and 28). The push-on holder from Lee fits those perfectly, no issues. Regarding brand, I have one Hasselblad filter and one from kenko. I have removed the glass on both to only use the ring for the push-on holder. Works like a charm except for some vignetting on the full-frame sensor.
Hope this helps.

danord

 

[JeRuFo]

If you invest in a high quality lens you don't go cheap on the filter. Hasselblad sells a 95mm screw on polarizer that can accept the Lee push on.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/co...ap=y&m=Y&c3api=1876,91438732682,&Q=&A=details

Email me if you have questions.

Kind regards,
Derek

Not using a filter is better than an expensive filter. I mentioned it because he simply seems to want a ring to put the filter holder on. Why put another piece of glass on there if you also put 1 or more square filters on.

 

[jecxz]

Not using a filter is better than an expensive filter. I mentioned it because he simply seems to want a ring to put the filter holder on. Why put another piece of glass on there if you also put 1 or more square filters on.

You are correct, for some reason I thought he wrote polarizer. Have a good weekend.

Kind regards,
Derek

 

[jeffwright]

All the best for 2017!

I am looking for a 95mm circular UV or clear filter with 100mm outer diameter in order to utilise a LEE 100mm push-on filter holder on my HCD35-90 lens. Most of those filters (e.g. B+W) are 97 to 98mm. Does anyone have any suggestion? Thanks very much.

Regards, Udo

How about this solution used for the Leica Super-Elmar-S 24-credit to Vieri Bottazzini Same problem as yours, more or less.

 

[Udo]

Many thanks for all your replies and hints.

@ Jeff: thanks for that link. This Leica lens has a bit longer front lens barrel beyond the protrusions (guessing around 8 to 9mm) which are part of the bayonet for the lens hood. The H(CD) lenses' front barrels are designed in a similar way but with a front barrel's length of approximately 3 to 4mm beyond the lens hood's bayonet which is too short to fix the push-on filter properly.

So I was looking for a filter (ring) which extends the front barrel with its exact diameter in order to gain the space needed for the push-on filter holder.

The search continues...

Regards, Udo

 

[jvpictures]

why do you want to use the Lee push-on filter holder for the 100mm system instead using the standard 95mm Adapter ring? Can you enlighten me/us?
thanks

 

[Udo]

why do you want to use the Lee push-on filter holder for the 100mm system instead using the standard 95mm Adapter ring? Can you enlighten me/us?
thanks

The combination you mentioned starts to vignette for focal lengths <=38mm if two filters are being used.