gogopix
Subscriber
ok now the f5.6
Remember these are crops of the P65+, so 1000 pixels is only about 10% of the frame whereas for 22MP or 30MP it is 15-20% of the frame. This is really zoomed in and will show the lens performance.
Note that the f3.5 were pretty darn good. Here, the first one may be OOF as it may have focused a but farther out (no reson for 5.6 to be less sharp tha 3.5 we are no where near a difraction limit)
Note too that the upper rt corner at 5.6 seems a bit sharper (both 3.5 and 5.6 shot are at infinity, so, unless the tree walked on me, they should be in the same DOF
BTW to see in all their glory, you need to ck twice-to get a separate image, then zoom. Better just download
anybody want the raw I can send via YOUSENDIT
Dont woryy CR; these ain't gonna make House Beautiful!:ROTFL:
Regards
Victor
PS Carsten; Gefaelt Ihnen diese Bildgruppe? SInd Sie eigentlich Englaender oder Amerikaner?
Remember these are crops of the P65+, so 1000 pixels is only about 10% of the frame whereas for 22MP or 30MP it is 15-20% of the frame. This is really zoomed in and will show the lens performance.
Note that the f3.5 were pretty darn good. Here, the first one may be OOF as it may have focused a but farther out (no reson for 5.6 to be less sharp tha 3.5 we are no where near a difraction limit)
Note too that the upper rt corner at 5.6 seems a bit sharper (both 3.5 and 5.6 shot are at infinity, so, unless the tree walked on me, they should be in the same DOF
BTW to see in all their glory, you need to ck twice-to get a separate image, then zoom. Better just download
anybody want the raw I can send via YOUSENDIT
Dont woryy CR; these ain't gonna make House Beautiful!:ROTFL:
Regards
Victor
PS Carsten; Gefaelt Ihnen diese Bildgruppe? SInd Sie eigentlich Englaender oder Amerikaner?