There is one thing which I believe to see again and again:
With my MF images the transition between the focused distance (sharp area of the image) and the out of focus areas seems (much) smoother compared to 35mm images.
I would even say the transition between sharp and unsharp looks more film like with MF compared to 35mm-sized sensors.
I wonder why? Is it the size of the sensor or could it be that sharpening-algorithms of AA-filtered images produce a different look.
Or is it just my illusion?
I gave up to try to rum comparison test between systems and formats but just judge from using the gear and look at the overall results.
With my MF images the transition between the focused distance (sharp area of the image) and the out of focus areas seems (much) smoother compared to 35mm images.
I would even say the transition between sharp and unsharp looks more film like with MF compared to 35mm-sized sensors.
I wonder why? Is it the size of the sensor or could it be that sharpening-algorithms of AA-filtered images produce a different look.
Or is it just my illusion?
I gave up to try to rum comparison test between systems and formats but just judge from using the gear and look at the overall results.