tashley
Subscriber Member
This sounds like madness but I saw some comparison files at my dealer today and
* The DR looks better
* The 40's smaller sensor crops off the weakest parts of some lenses
* The pixel binning means no more switching to another camera when the light drops
* As far as I can see even without pixel binning, ISO 400 is very nice
For which benefits I'd pay the cost of a smaller sensor and therefore less wide lenses. I'm not a great wide shooter anyway but I also think this will give me an advantage as an occasional tech cam user.
I write this in haste, convinced that I must be missing something. But what?
Best
Tim
* The DR looks better
* The 40's smaller sensor crops off the weakest parts of some lenses
* The pixel binning means no more switching to another camera when the light drops
* As far as I can see even without pixel binning, ISO 400 is very nice
For which benefits I'd pay the cost of a smaller sensor and therefore less wide lenses. I'm not a great wide shooter anyway but I also think this will give me an advantage as an occasional tech cam user.
I write this in haste, convinced that I must be missing something. But what?
Best
Tim